Page 403 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 403

Unit 31: Semantic: Meaning Types: Lexical, Contextual and Others Semantics Practice



        Since some words may overlap with others in their possible contexts, as does house with hut,  Notes
        home, etc. It is better to deal with sets of words, rather than with individual word alone. In such
        study, the words, which fall into a context or set of contexts, are referred to as an “associative
        field”. This point has been illustrated by Winfred P. Lehmann (Historical Linguistics, 1966 : 198) in
        the diagram given on the followig page :



                                   AUDIENCE
                                                       HUT





                                             HOUSE         HOME
                              SENATE



                                     DORMI-        COTTAGE
                                      TORY



        The right section of the circle represent the meaning of house as ‘habitation’; sections on the left
        represent its meaning as ‘a building belonging to a university,’ ‘a governing body,’ and ‘a group
        of onlookers,’ leaving space for still other meanings. Similar sets of circles could be produced to
        represent the meanings of various words and fields throughout the languages.
        This approach requires a live and first-hand ‘field’ knowledge of languages as they are actually
        used; but to date it has produced little to rival the various analytical approaches.
        Field Theory of Meaning
        Saussure demonstrated that each word in a language is surrounded by a network of associations
        which connect with still other terms. Some of these connections arise between the five senses
        (synaesthetic); others between the form or shape of words; while others involve formal and semantic
        connections. ‘A given term is like the centre of a constellation, the point where other coordinated
        terms converge, and their sum is indefinite.’ To illustrate this, one can draw up the following
        diagram :

                                       TEACHING


                                                           UNTEACH
                                    PEDAGOGY      TEACHER
                            TO TEACH                                 LEARN
                                    EDUCATION EDUCATING TAOGHT
                       WE TEACH     TUTELAGE


                   ETC              INSTRUCTION    INSTRUCTING     TEACHABILITY
                                    GUIDANCE           TRAINING
                                    DIRECTION             PREACHING
                                    TUITION
        In the first ‘leg’ of this scheme are the terms to teach’, ‘we teach’, linked by the similarity of
        grammatical form. Those of the second ‘leg’ (pedagogy, tutelage, education, direction, guidance,



                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       397
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408