Page 343 - DMTH401_REAL ANALYSIS
P. 343
Unit 28: Sequences of Functions and Littlewood’s Third Principle
lim (B ) = 0. Notes
m®¥ m
Choose N such that (B ) < and let B = B . Then by definition of B , one can check that holds.
N N N
This concludes Step 1.
Step 2: We now finish the proof. Let > 0. Then by Step 1, for each k we can find a measurable
set A X and a corresponding natural number N such that
k k
1
(A ) < and for x A c , |f(x) – f (x)| < for all n > N .
k k k n k
2 k
Now put A = ¥ k 1 A . Then (A) < and we claim that f ® f uniformly on A . Indeed, let > 0 and
c
k
=
n
choose k such that 1/k < . Then
¥
x A = A x A c k
c
c
j
=
j 1
1
|f(x) – f (x)| < for all n > N
n k
k
|f(x) – f (x)| < for all n > N .
n k
Thus, f ® f a.u.
n
We remark that one cannot drop the finiteness assumption.
Self Assessment
Fill in the blanks:
1. Let {f } be a sequence of ........................................... on a measure space (X, S , ). We define
n
the functions sup f , inf f , lim sup f , and lim inf f , by applying these limit operations
n n n n
pointwise to the sequence of extended real numbers {f (x)} at each point x X.
n
2. If the sequence {f } is ................................, that is, either non-decreasing or non-increasing,
n
then lim f is everywhere defined and it is measurable.
n
p
3. If f and g are measurable, then .............................., and |f | where p > 0, are also measurable,
whenever each expression is defined.
4. Every convergent series of measurable functions is ................................... when certain sets
of measure are neglected, where can be as small as desired.
28.4 Summary
For a sequence {a } of extended real numbers, we know, in general, that lim a does not
n n
exist; for example, it can oscillate. Assuming that the sequence continues the way it looks
like it does, it is clear that although limit lim a does not exist, the sequence does have an
n
“upper” limiting value, given by the limit of the odd-indexed a ’s and a “lower” limiting
n
value, given by the limit of the even-indexed a ’s. Now how do we find the “upper” (also
n
called “supremum”) and “lower” (also called “infimum”) limits of {a }? It turns out there
n
is a very simple way to do so, as we now explain.
Let {f } be a sequence of extended-real valued functions on a measure space (X, S , ). We
n
define the functions sup f , inf f , lim sup f , and lim inf f , by applying these limit operations
n n n n
pointwise to the sequence of extended real numbers {f (x)} at each point x X. For example,
n
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY 337