Page 370 - DMTH401_REAL ANALYSIS
P. 370
Real Analysis
Notes Next our aim is to determine the cardinality of ( ). We need some set-theoretic preparation.
d
Definition: An order on a set X is a partial order if (i) x x for every x X, (ii) x y and y x
x = y for every x, y X, (iii) x y and y z x z for every x, y, z X. We say (X, ) is a totally
ordered set if is a partial order and any two elements of X are comparable. We say (X, ) is a
well-ordered set if (X, ) is totally ordered and any nonempty subset Y X has a least element
in Y.
Examples:
(i) Let X be the collection of all nonempty subsets of . Define an order on X as A B iff the
minimum of A is less than or equal to the minimum of B. Then this is not a partial order
since the second condition fails.
(ii) If X is any nonempty set, then (X) with inclusion as order is partially ordered, but in
general not totally ordered.
(iii) with the usual order is totally ordered, but not well-ordered since the subset (0,1) does
not contain a least element.
(iv) with the usual order is well-ordered.
Well-ordering principle (equivalent to the axiom of choice): Any nonempty set admits a well-
ordering.
Now we describe the construction of some ordinal numbers. Start with an uncountable set X
such that card(X) = card(), and let be a well-ordering on X. Let denote the least element of
X. By adding one extra element to X if necessary, we may also assume that (X, ) has a largest
element, say . For each X, let L = { X : < } be the left section of in X. Let Y = { X
: L is uncountable}. Then Y Ø since Y. So Y has a least element, say . Then L is
uncountable, but L is countable for every < . Here, is called the first uncountable ordinal,
and each L is called a countable ordinal number since each L represents the type of a
countable well-ordered set through L .
Fact: If A L is a nonempty countable set, then A has a least upper bound in L . [Proof: If B =
A
L , then B is countable and hence L \B Ø. The least element of L \B is the least upper bound of
A]
If L , then the least element of the nonempty set { L : < } will be denoted as +1. Note
that there are no elements between and + 1 in L . On the other hand, given L , there may
or may not exist L such that + 1 = . For example, if L is the least upper bound of the
countable set {, +1, + 2,…} (where recall that is the least element of L ), then there is no
X with + 1 = . We say L is a limit ordinal if there is no L with + 1 = .
card(( )) = card().
d
Proof: We will use transfinite induction (i.e., induction with respect to ordinal numbers) by using
L described above. Recall that we denoted the least element of L by the symbol . To start the
induction process, let = {U : U is open}. Let L and assume that we have defined for
d
every L . If is a limit ordinal, define = < A . If = + 1 for some L , let
d
d
= {A : \ A }, and = {A : A is a countable union of members from }.
d
This defines for every L . Finally, put = < . From our construction, it is clear that
( ).
d
We verify that is a -algebra on . It suffices to check only the third property. So consider
d
A ,A ,…. Then there are , ,… L such that A for every n . By the Fact
1 2 1 2 n n
mentioned above, the countable set { : n } has a least upper bound, say in L . Then A
n n
364 LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY