Page 169 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 169

Abstract Algebra




                    Notes          Theorem 2: If I and J are ideals of a ring R, then
                                   (a)  IJ,

                                   (b)  I + J = { a + b | a  I and b  J }, and
                                   (c)  IJ = { x  R | x is a finite sum a b  + ... + a b , where ai 1 and bi  J } are ideals of R.
                                                                1 1
                                                                        m m
                                   Proof: (a) From Theorem 2 you know that I  J is a subring of R. Now, if a  l  J, then a  I and
                                   a  J. Therefore, ax  I and a  J for all x in R. So ax  I  J for all a  I  J and x  R. Thus, I  J
                                   is an ideal of R.

                                   (b)  Firstly, 0 = 0 + 0  l + J   I + J = f.
                                   Secondly, if x, y  1 + J, then x = a  + b  and y = a  + b  for some a , a ,  I and b , b   J.
                                                                          2
                                                              1
                                                                 1
                                                                             2
                                                                                                  1
                                                                                                    2
                                                                                         2
                                                                                       1
                                   So x – y = (a  + b ) – (a  + b ) = (a  – a ) (b  – b )  I + J.
                                            1
                                                        2
                                                1
                                                    2
                                                                   1
                                                                      2
                                                             1
                                                                2
                                   Finally, let x  I + J and r  R. Then x = a + b for some a  I and b  J. Now
                                   xr = (a + b)r = ar +br  I + J, as a  I implies ar  I and b  J implies br  J for all r  R.
                                   Thus, I + J is an ideal of R.
                                   (c)  Firstly, IJ  , since I   and J  .
                                   Next, let x, y  IJ. Then x = a b  + ... + a b  and
                                                         1 1      m m
                                   y = a’ b’  + ... + a’ b’  for some a , ..., a, a’ ,.. ., a’,  I and b ,.., b , b’ ,...., , b’   J.
                                         1
                                                n
                                                            l
                                                                  1
                                                  n
                                                                                i
                                                                                             n
                                                                                       1
                                                                                   m
                                       1
                                    x – y = (a b  + ... + a b ) – (a’ b’  + ... + a’ b’ )
                                            1 1
                                                    m m
                                                           1
                                                                     n
                                                             1
                                                                       n
                                   = a b  + ... + a b  + (– a’ )b’  + ... + (– a’ )b’ n
                                                        1
                                                     1
                                     1 1
                                             m m
                                                                 n
                                   which is a finite sum of elements of the form ab with a  I and b  J.
                                   So, x – y  IJ.
                                   Finally, let x  IJ say x = a b  + ... + a b  with a,  1 and b, E J. Then, for any r E R
                                                       1 1
                                                                n n
                                   xr = (a b  + ... + a b )r = a (b r ) ... + a (b r),
                                                                  n
                                                                n
                                                       1
                                                n n
                                        1 1
                                                         1
                                   which is a finite sum of elements of the form ab with a  1 and b  J.
                                   (Note that b   J  b r  J for all r in R.)
                                            i
                                                   i
                                   Thus, IJ is an ideal of R.
                                   Over here, we would like to remark that if we define IJ = { ab | a E I, b  J }, then IJ need not even
                                   be a subring, leave alone being an ideal. This is because if x, y E IJ, then with this definition of IJ
                                   it is not necessary that x – y  IJ.
                                   Let us now look at the relationship between the ideals obtained. Let us first look at the following
                                   particular situation:
                                   R = Z, I = 22 and J = 10Z. Then I  J = J, since J  I. Also, any element of I + J is ot the form x = 2n
                                   + 10m, where n, m  2. Thus, x = 2(n + 5m)  2Z. On the other hand, 2Z = f  I + J. Thus , I + J =
                                   < 2 , 1 0 > = < 2 >.
                                   Similarly, you can see that IJ = < 20 >.
                                   Note that IJ  IJ  I  I + J.
                                   In fact, these inclusions are true for any I and J. We show the relationship in figure 16.1.
          162                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174