Page 198 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 198

Unit 19: The Field of Quotient Euclidean Domains




                                                                                                Notes
                Example: Show that  2Z  is a maximal ideal of Z , whereas  (0,4,8)  is not.
                                                       12
                                  12
          Solution: You know that Z  = Z/12Z and  2Z  = 2Z/12Z. We see that Z / 2Z = (Z/12Z)/
                                                12
                                                                            12
                                12
                                                                       12
          (2Z/12Z) = Z , which is a field. Therefore,  2Z  {0,2,4,6,8,10}  is maximal in Z .
                                               12
                     2
                                                                          12
          Now  {0, 4, 8} = 4Z   2Z  Z .
                              12
                         12
                                   12
          Therefore,  {0, 4, 8}  is not maximal in Z .
                                          12
          We first introduced you to a special ideal of a ring, called a prime ideal. Its speciality lies in the
          fact that the quotient ring corresponding to it is an integral domain.
          Then we discussed a special kind of prime ideal, i.e., a maximal ideal.
          19.2 Field of Quotients
                                                                 a
          Consider Z and Q. You know that every element of Q is of the form   ,  where a  Z and b  Z*.
                                                                 b
                                   a
          Actually, we can also denote    by the ordered pair (a, b)  Z × Z*. Now, in Q we know that
                                   b
           a  c
           b    d  = - iff ad = bc. Let us put a similar relation on the elements of Z × Z*

          Now, we also know that the operations on Q are given by
                          a c
           a  c  ad bc and .   a c  a c  Q.
                   
                                     , 
           b    d    bd  b d    b d  b d
          Keeping these in mind we can define operations on Z × Z*. Then we can suitably define an
          equivalence relation on Z × Z* to get a field isomorphic to Q.
          We can generalise this procedure to obtain a field from any integral domain. So, take an integral
          domain R. Let K be the following set of ordered pairs:
          K= {(a,b) ) a , b  R and b  0)
          We define a relation ~ in K by
          (a, b) ~ (c, d) if ad = bc.

          We claim that ~ is an equivalence relation. Let us see if this is so.
          (i)  (a, b) ~ (a, b)    (a, b)  K, since R is commutative. Thus, ~ is reflexive.

          (ii)  Let (a, b), (c, d)  K such that (a, b) ~ (c, d). Then ad = bc, i.e., cb = da. Therefore, (c, d) ~
               (a, b). Thus, ~ is symmetric.
          (iii)  Finally, let (a,b), (c,d), ( u, v)  K such that (a,b) – (c,d) and (c,d) ~ (u,v ). Then ad = bc and
               cv = du. Therefore, (ad) v = (bc)v = bdu, i.e., avd =bud. Thus, by the cancellation law for
               multiplication (which is valid for a domain), we get av = bu, i.e., (a,b) – (u,v). Thus, – is
               transitive.
          Hence, ~ is an equivalence relation.








                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  191
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203