Page 259 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 259

Abstract Algebra




                    Notes          is a product of copies of the field K , so it has no non-zero nilpotent elements. If (X) is inseparable,

                                   then  K [X]/((X)) is a  product of copies  of rings  K [Y ]/( Y p m  ) with  m >  0, which all have
                                   nonzero nilpotents.

                                   Now we consider the structure of  K   L when L/K is any finite extension.
                                                                  K
                                   First assume L/K is separable. By the primitive element theorem, we can write L = K() and 
                                   is separable over K. By the first paragraph of the proof,  K  K  L   K  [L:K]  since (X) has distinct
                                                                                      
                                   linear factors in  K .
                                   If L/K  is  inseparable, then some a  L  is  inseparable over  K. Tensoring the  inclusion  map
                                   K()  L up to  K , we have an inclusion

                                                               K  K()   K   L.
                                                                    K
                                                                               K
                                   The ring  K  K() has a non-zero nilpotent element by the first paragraph of the proof, so
                                               K
                                   K  L does as well.
                                       K
                                   Corollary: The proof of Theorem 2 implies Theorem 4.
                                   Proof: Make  a tower  of intermediate  extensions in  L/K as  in (2.2). Note  K   is an algebraic
                                   closure of every field L  in the tower. Since
                                                     i
                                                              K  K  L   (K   K  L )   L1  L
                                                                             1
                                   and L  = K( ) with   separable over K, the proof of Theorem 2 implies
                                             1
                                                    1
                                       1
                                                                  K  K  L  K [L 1 :K]
                                                                        1
                                   as  K -algebras. Therefore


                                                          K  K  L   K [L 1 :K]   L 1  L   (K  L  1  L) [L 1 :K]
                                   Since L = L ( ,...  ) with each   separable over L , we can run through the same computation
                                                             i
                                                                           1
                                              2
                                            1
                                                  r
                                   for  K  L 2  L  as we did for  K  K  L,  and we get  K  L 1  L   (K  L 2  L) [L 2 :L ] ,  so
                                                                                          1
                                                       K  K  L   (K  L 2  L) [L 2 :L ][L :K]  = (K  L L) [L 2 :K] .
                                                                           1
                                                                        1
                                                                                    2
                                   Repeating this enough, in the end we get
                                                            K  K  L   (K   r L  L) [L r :K]   K [L:K] .
                                                                  
                                   Corollary: The proof of Theorem 2 implies Theorem 5.
                                   Proof: The field  K  is an algebraic closure of F and L. Using Theorem 2,
                                            K  L  ( K  F)  L
                                                        K
                                               K
                                                            F
                                                    K [F:K] L      since F/K is separable
                                                            F
                                                    ( K  L) [F:K]
                                                        F






          252                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264