Page 292 - DMTH403_ABSTRACT_ALGEBRA
P. 292
Unit 31: The Galois Group of a Polynomial
For example for n = 17 there is a period that is a sum of eight roots of unity, one that is a sum of Notes
four roots of unity, and one that is the sum of two, which is cos(2/17).
Each of those is a root of a quadratic equation in terms of the one before. Moreover, these
equations have real rather than imaginary roots, so in principle can be solved by geometric
construction: this because the work all goes on inside a totally real field.
In this way the result of Gauss can be understood in current terms; for actual calculation of the
equations to be solved, the periods can be squared and compared with the lower periods, in a
quite feasible algorithm.
Compass and Straightedge Constructions
Compass and straightedge constructions are known for all constructible polygons. If n = p· q
with p = 2 or p and q co-prime, an n-gon can be constructed from a p-gon and a q-gon.
If p = 2, draw a q-gon and bisect one of its central angles. From this, a 2q-gon can be
constructed.
If p > 2, inscribe a p-gon and a q-gon in the same circle in such a way that they share a
vertex. Because p and q are relatively prime, there exists integers a,b such that ap + bq = 1.
Then 2a/q + 2b/p = 2/pq. From this, a p·q-gon can be constructed.
Thus one only has to find a compass and straightedge construction for n-gons where n is a
Fermat prime.
The construction for an equilateral triangle is simple and has been known since Antiquity.
Constructions for the regular pentagon were described both by Euclid and by Ptolemy.
Although Gauss proved that the regular 17-gon is constructible, he didnt actually show
how to do it. The first construction is due to Erchinger, a few years after Gauss work.
The first explicit construction of a regular 257-gon was given by Friedrich Julius Richelot
(1832).
A construction for a regular 65537-gon was first given by Johann Gustav Hermes (1894).
The construction is very complex; Hermes spent 10 years completing the 200-page
manuscript. (Conway has cast doubt on the validity of Hermes construction, however.
Figure 31.2
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY 285