Page 46 - DMTH404_STATISTICS
P. 46

Statistics



                      Notes         We now proceed to study some implications of independence of two events A  and A .
                                                                                                   1     2
                                    Recall that
                                                                  c
                                          P(A ) = P(A   A ) + P(A    A ).
                                             1     1   2     1    2
                                    Then
                                                 c
                                          P(A    A ) = P(A ) – P(A   A )
                                             1   2      1     1   2
                                    Now, if A  and A  are independent, we get
                                            1     2
                                            c
                                    P(A    A ) = P(A ) {1 – P(A )}
                                       1    2     1       2
                                                       c
                                                  = P(A ) P( A )
                                                  1    2
                                                                                       c
                                    Thus, the independence of A  andA  implies that of A  and  A . Now interchange the roles of
                                                            1    2              1      2
                                                                                                      c
                                    A  and A  What do you get? We get that if A  and A  are independent, then so are  A  and A . The
                                      1    2                           1    2                         2     2
                                                                                        c
                                                                                               c
                                                    c
                                    independence of  A  and A  then implies the independence of  A  and  A  too.
                                                    1     2                             1      2
                                    Now here is an interesting fact.
                                    If A is an almost sure event, then A and another event B are independent.
                                                                                               C
                                    Let us see how . Since A  is an alm ost sure event, P(A ) = 1. H ence P(A )  = 0 and  therefore,
                                       C
                                    P(A   B) = 0. In particular,
                                          P(B) = P(A  B) + P(A   B) = P(A  B).
                                                           c
                                    One consequence of this is that
                                          P(A  B) = I.P(B) = P(A) P(B),
                                    which implies that A and B are independent.
                                    Can you prove a similar result for a null event ? You can check that if A is a null event, then A and
                                    any other event B are independent.
                                    Now, can we extend the definition of independence of two events to that of the independence of
                                    three events? The obvious way seems to be to call A , A , A , independent if P(A   A   A )
                                                                               1  2  3                 1   2   3
                                    = P(A )P(A )P(A ). But this does not work. Because if 3 events are independgnt, we would expect
                                         1   2   3
                                    any two of them also to be  independent. But this is not  ensured by the condition above. To
                                    appreciate this, consider the case when A  = A  = A, 0 < P (A) < 1, and P(A ) = 0. Then P(A   A )
                                                                     1   2                     3           1   2
                                                           2
                                    = P(A)  P(A ) P(A ) = P[(A)] .
                                              1    2
                                    Thus, A  and A  are not independent, but P(A   A   A ) = P(A ) P(A ) P(A ) is satisfied. So, to get
                                          1     2                       1   2   3     1   2    3
                                    around this problem we add some more conditions and get the following definition
                                    Definition 5 : Three events A , A  and A  corresponding to the same random experiment are said
                                                           1  2     3
                                    to be stochastically or mutually independent if
                                    P(A   A ) = p(A ) P(A )
                                       1   2      1   2
                                    P(A   A ) = P(A ) P(A )                                                ...(15)
                                       2   3      2   3
                                    and P(A   A   A ) = P(A ) P(A ) P(A ).
                                           1   2   3     1    2   3








            38                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51