Page 139 - DMTH503_TOPOLOGY
P. 139

Richa Nandra, Lovely Professional University                             Unit 14: Limit Point Compactness





                          Unit 14: Limit Point Compactness                                      Notes


             CONTENTS
             Objectives
             Introduction

             14.1 Limit Point Compactness and Sequentially Compact
                 14.1.1  Limit Point Compactness
                 14.1.2  Sequentially Compact

             14.2 Summary
             14.3 Keywords
             14.4 Review Questions
             14.5 Further Readings

          Objectives

          After studying this unit, you will be able to:

              Define limit-point compactness and solve related problems;
              Define the term sequentially compact and solve questions on it.

          Introduction

          In this unit, we introduce limit point compactness. In some ways, this property is more natural
          and intuitive than that of compactness. In the early days of topology, it was given the name
          “compactness”, while the open covering formulation was called “bicompactness”. Later, the
          word “compact” was shifted to apply the open covering definition, leaving this one to search for
          a new name. It still has not found a name on which everyone agrees. On historical grounds,
          some call it “Frechet compactness” others call it the “Bolzano–Weierstrass property”. We have
          invented the term “limit point compactness”. It seems as good a term as any at least it describes
          what the property is about.

          14.1 Limit Point Compactness and Sequentially Compact


          14.1.1 Limit Point Compactness

          A space X is said to be limit point compact if every infinite subset of X has a limit point.
          Theorem 1: Compactness implies limit point compactness, but not conversely.
          Proof: Let X be a compact space. Given a subset A of X, we wish to prove that if A is infinite, then
          A has a limit point. We prove the contra positive – if A has no limit point, then A must be finite.
          So suppose A has no limit point. Then A contains all its limit points, so that A is closed. Further
          more, for each a A, we can choose a neighborhood U   of a such that U  intersects A in the point
                                                     a             a
          a alone. The space of X is covered by the open set X – A and the open sets U ; being compact, it can
                                                                     a
          be covered by finitely many of these sets. Since X – A does not intersect A, and each set U
                                                                                      a
          contains only one point of A, the set A must be finite.


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   133
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144