Page 233 - DSOC402_SOCIOLOGY_OF_KINSHIP_ENGLISH
P. 233

Unit  29:  Family and Marriage in India: Forces of Change, Family in the Context of Care of the Child and the Aged





                    (iii) Changes in Economic Functions:  A joint family was the production and consumer unit   Notes
                     where labour division was prevalent. It fulfilled all the economic needs. but today it is
                     nothing more than a consumption unit, Now, economic security is being provided by the
                     government and other institutions.
                    (iv)  Changes in Forms of Entertainment:  Earlier, it was the joint family, who provided enter-
                     tainment to its members. But now cinema, radio, television, clubs and business recreation
                     institutions have taken up this job.
                  By the structural and functional viewpoint, the traditional families were joined, but now both
                  have changed. Gore and Desai are of the view that on the structural level, their number has
                  reduced but on the functional level, there, number has still not reduced.

                  29.3  Future of Joint Family

                  Because of the various changes in the joint families, the question that arises is  will there be an
                  end to joint families in future or will they disintegrate totally. Optimists are of the view that it is
                  not the disintegration of joint families but their changed form. It is in the process of adjustment
                  to the new circumstances. Those supporting disintegration are of the opinion that reduction in
                  the size of the family, the diminished power of the head of family, increased power of women,
                  property rights granted to family members, feeble family control and reduction of roles, etc., are
                  indicators of disintegration only. They are of the view that as urbanization and industrialisation
                  grow; and the newer means of transport come up, joint families will face disintegration and
                  nuclear families will increase, as they did in Europe. On the other hand, optimists are of the view
                  that industrialisation and urbanisation in India may not create the same effect as in Europe. Here,
                  it is not disintegration of families but their form. Prof. Kapadia says even today, a joint family
                  provides total social support to its members. Because of the prevalence of child marriages, it is
                  the joint family which supports the newly-wedded couple. Because of the lack of health facilities
                  in villages, it is the joint family who takes care during illness and delivery. Apart from that, the
                  widowed and deserted sisters and daughters are also provided support by the family. Last few
                  years, social efforts like insurance, Provident fund, gratuity, health, support, bonus, etc., have
                  been made but these facilities are limited to people in industrial and government services only.
                  Almost 70% of the population who lives in villages and depends on agriculutre, still get social
                  security from joint families only. Thus, the future of joint familes is knotted with the villages.
                  There is a cordial  relation between joint family and agricultural work. The  disintegration
                  of a family means division of fertile agricultural land. It is the joint family which fulfills the
                  need for workforce which is required for agricultural  work.  Dr.  Kapadia says the  future
                  of  joint  families  depends  on  two  factors.  He  writes  that  families  today  face  financial  and
                  ideological  crisis.  The  reason  for  financial  fail  to  save  money  to  send  to  the  family  back
                  home,  thus  turnings the relations  sour.  The  ideological  crisis  is  that the new generation
                  refuses to accept the dominance of family. Now, the right  between  the mother-in-law and
                  daughter-in law has depended. The mother-in-law can neither tolerate the new position of the
                  daughter-in-law nor can she accept the sympathetic attitude of the husband towards her. If
                  a family survives such crisis, there is no likelihood of family disintegration. Kapadia admits
                  that the Hindu attitude still supports joint families. Dr. R.N. Saxena too, has confirmed the
                  financial and social support provided by joint families. He says, “Today, the mutual relations
                  amongst the members of a joint family are its real form; not the joint residence property or
                  kitchen. It is definite that the number of disintegrated joint families has gone up and every
                  such family gives birth to many new joint families, in due course of time. Dr. Indra Dev is of
                  the opinion that the disintegrated families have not taken the form of simple and pure personal
                  families. The form they are taking could be termed as intermediary types. I.P. Isai and other
                  sociologists believe that nuclear family is a phase in the joint family structure. At the initial
                  stage, the parts which separates from the joint families are in the form of nuclear families. In due
                  course of time, they transform into joint families. Ram Krishna Mukherjee writes, “The central


                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                      227
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238