Page 252 - DCOM102_DMGT101_PRINCIPLES_AND_PRACTICES_OF_MANAGEMENT
P. 252

Principles and Practices of Management




                    Notes                        formal  lines  of  communication  and  deciding  how  tasks  are  to
                                                 be performed.

                                            (ii)  Consideration Behaviour(C): Demonstrating concern for followers and trying
                                                 to establish a friendly and supportive work climate based on mutual trust.
                                            These two kinds of behaviour were viewed as independent, meaning a particular
                                            leader can score high in use of one type of behaviour, the other, or both. Leaders
                                            who scored high on IS generally led high-producing groups and were rated highly
                                            by their superiors. However, the subordinates of those leaders tended to have lower
                                            morale, higher grievance rates,  and higher turnover. Leaders high on C, on the
                                            other hand, generally led groups with higher morale but lower productivity. Thus,
                                            each of the specific leader behaviours had positive and negative outcomes associated
                                            with them. The extension of these findings by some later theorists led to the conclusion
                                            that leaders high on both LS an C would simultaneously satisfy their superiors (by
                                            achieving high performance) and their subordinated (by improving their morale).
                                       (b)  University of Michigan Studies: Under Rensis Likert, researchers at the University of
                                            Michigan conducted extensive interviews with managers and the employees who
                                            reported  to them. After studying  numerous industrial situations, the researchers
                                            concluded that two leadership styles – employee-centered and production or task-
                                            centered – influenced employee performance and satisfaction.

                                            (i)  Task-Centered Leader Behaviour: An effort to lead employees by focusing on
                                                 work and how well employees performs. The task-centered leader pays close
                                                 attention  to  employees'  work,  explains  work  procedures,  and  is  deeply
                                                 interested in performance.
                                            (ii)  Employee-centered  Leader  Behaviour:  An  effort  to  lead  employees  by
                                                 developing a cohesive work group and ensuring employee satisfaction. The
                                                 employee-centered leader emphasizes employees' well being rather than the
                                                 tasks they perform.
                                       The researchers defined these behaviours as mutually exclusive; a leader tends to use one
                                       or the other. The Michigan studies showed that employee-centered leaders supervised
                                       groups with higher morale and productivity, while production-centered leaders supervised
                                       groups  with lower  productivity and  morale. These  findings led  to the belief that the
                                       employee-centered leadership style was superior to the production-centered leadership
                                       style.
                                   3.  Contingency Theory of Leadership: Fiedler's contingency model is one of the most serious
                                       and elaborate situational theories in leadership literature. Fiedler is probably the first
                                       researcher who recognised the need for a broader explanation of leadership phenomena
                                       anchored on situational variables.
                                       Fiedler's model is called a 'contingency' model because the leader's effectiveness is partially
                                       contingent upon three major situational variables.
                                       (a)  Leader-member relations: It refers to the degree of confidence, trust and respect followers
                                            have in the leader. It indicates the degree to which group members like the leader
                                            and are willing to accept the leader's behaviour, as an influence on them.
                                       (b)  Task structure: It measures the extent to which the task performed by subordinates is
                                            routine or non-routine. In other words, task structure refers to how routine and
                                            predictable the work group's task is.






          244                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257