Page 69 - DCOM103_COMMERCIAL_LAW
P. 69

Commercial Law




                    Notes          Practical note for business executives. The business executives must note that the circumstances,
                                   on the basis of which a contract was entered into, may undergo radical changes, for no fault of
                                   either party as a result whereof the contract may even become impossible to perform as s.56
                                   provides, inter alia, that the subsequent illegality or impossibility of the agreement renders it
                                   void. We have observed earlier that ‘impossibility’ means legal impossibility and does not cover
                                   commercial impossibility. Thus, a strike may create a difficult situation, but it does not amount

                                   to ‘impossibility’ in the legal sense. It is a case of mere commercial impossibility, which if the

                                   parties desire, may specifically provide for in the contract. Such a provision is contained in what
                                   is known as ‘force majeure clause’ in the contract. The effect of such a clause is to totally dispense
                                   with the performance of all obligations arising otherwise than under a contract.
                                   Effect of supervening impossibility. There are three effects of supervening impossibility: (i) A
                                   contract to do an act which, after the contract is made becomes impossible or by reason of some
                                   event which the promisor couldn’t prevent, unlawful, becomes void when the act becomes
                                   impossible or unlawful (s.56). (ii) Where a person has promised to do something which he knew,
                                   or with reasonable diligence, might have known and which the promisee did not know to be
                                   impossible or unlawful, such promisor must make compensation to such promisee for any loss
                                   which such promisee sustains through the non-performance of the promise (s.56). (iii) When a
                                   contract becomes void, any person who received any advantage under such contract is bound
                                   to restore it, or to make compensation for it to the person from whom he received it (s.65). Thus,
                                   where A contracts to sing for B at a concert for ` 1,000, which are paid in advance. A is too ill to
                                   sing. A must refund to B ` 1,000.

                                   6.2.4 Discharge of a Contract by Operation of Law

                                   Discharge by operation of law may take place in four ways:

                                   1.   By death. Death of the promisor results in termination of the contract in cases involving
                                       personal skill or ability.
                                   2.   By insolvency. The insolvency law provides for discharge of contracts under certain
                                       circumstances so where an order of discharge is passed by an insolvency court the insolvent
                                       stands discharged of all debts incurred previous to his adjudication.
                                   3.   By merger. When between the same parties, a new contract is entered into, and a security
                                       of a higher degree or a higher kind is taken, the previous contract merges in the higher
                                       security. Thus a right of action on an ordinary debt would be merged in the right of suing
                                       on a mortgage for the same debt.
                                   4.   By the unauthorised alteration of terms of a written document. Where any of the parties
                                       alters any of the terms of the contract without seeking the consent of the other party to it,
                                       the contract terminates.
                                   Further, Limitation Act, 1963, provides certain periods for fi ling suits, etc., in certain situations
                                   and if the party entitled to the remedy does not enforce its right within the prescribed time, then
                                   it is deprived of the remedy at law. In a way, this amounts to discharge of contract.

                                   6.2.5 Discharge of Contracts by Breach

                                   A breach of contract is one party’s failure, without a legal excuse, to live up to any of its promises
                                   under a contract. A contract terminates by breach of contract. If the promisor has not performed
                                   his promise in accordance with the terms of the contract or where the performance is not excused
                                   by tender, mutual consent or impossibility or operation of law, then this amounts to a breach
                                   of contract on the part of the promisor. The consequence of this is that the promisee becomes
                                   entitled to certain remedies. The breach of contract may arise in two ways: (i) anticipatory and
                                   (ii) actual.




          62                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74