Page 53 - DECO101_MICRO_ECONOMICS_ENGLISH
P. 53

Micro Economics




                    Notes              ice cream would be highly elastic. One the other hand, there are no good substitutes for
                                       salt, hence it is likely to be inelastic.
                                   2.   Number of uses the commodity satisfi ed: The greater the number of uses of the commodity,
                                       the greater is its price elasticity of demand. For example, aluminium, which has several
                                       uses, is likely to be highly elastic. Thus, if the price of aluminium fell by a small amount,
                                       the quantity demanded would increase substantially since it can be put to so many uses.
                                       Since the percentage change in price is small and the percentage change in quantity large,
                                       aluminium has a high price elasticity of demand. On the other hand, salt (which is only a
                                       food) has only a single use and hence is inelastic.
                                   3.   Time period: The greater the time period, the greater is the price elasticity of demand. For
                                       example, if the price of diesel increases, the quantity demanded by a firm will decrease by


                                       a very small amount because in the short run the firm uses equipment that runs on diesel.

                                       In the long run (greater time period), the firm can replace its existing equipment (which
                                       runs on diesel) for one which runs on electricity. Thus, the percentage change in quantity
                                       demanded is greater in the long run for the same percentage change in price. Thus, any
                                       commodity is likely to be more elastic when its “adjustment time” is longer.
                                   4.   Proportion of income spent on the commodity: The greater the proportion of income
                                       spent on a commodity, the larger is the price elasticity of demand. The reason is that the
                                       proportion of income previously being spent on the commodity determines what amount
                                       of income will be released as a result of the fall in price of the commodity. The income thus
                                       released will be spent on increasing the purchase of the commodity as well as all other
                                       commodities. Hence cars, refrigerators, etc., are likely to be price elastic while soaps, etc.,
                                       are likely to be inelastic.

                                   5.   How narrowly the commodity is defi ned: The more narrowly a commodity is defi ned, the
                                       greater is its price elasticity of demand. Hence the price elasticity of Marlboro cigarettes is
                                       greater than the price elasticity of cigarettes; the elasticity of Campa Cola is higher than that
                                       of soft drinks, etc. The reason is that there are many other good substitutes for Marlboro
                                       (namely the many other brands of cigarettes) than cigarettes in general (namely cigars and
                                       pipes).
                                   A review of the basic formula of elasticity will show that it follows from the defi nition of price
                                   elasticity.
                                                              % change in quantity demanded
                                                         e =−
                                                          p
                                                                    % change in price
                                   where,
                                                               New Quantity −  Old Quantity
                                   % change in Quantity demanded =                      × 100
                                                                      Old Quantity
                                                          New price – Old price
                                   and    % change in price  =   Old price  × 100

                                   Let,               P  =  Old price
                                                      Q  =  Old quantity
                                                    ∆Q  =  New quantity – Old quantity
                                                     ∆P  =  New price – Old price
                                                             Δ Q  × 100
                                                             Q            Δ Q P
                                                      e   =  (-)      =−      ×
                                                                        ()
                                                      p      Δ P           Δ P Q
                                                              P  × 100




          48                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58