Page 182 - DENG102_COMMUNICATION_SKILLS_II
P. 182

Unit 12: Basics of Official Correspondence




                                                                                                notes


              Task   rewrite the given case study in a brief and concise form
             It won’t do to say that the snoozing reader is too dumb or too lazy to keep pace with the
             train of thought. My sympathies are with him. If the reader is lost, it is generally because
             the writer has not been careful enough to keep him on the path.
             This carelessness can take any number of forms. Perhaps a sentence is so excessively cluttered
             that the reader, hacking his way through the verbiage, simply doesn’t know what it means.
             Perhaps a sentence has been so shoddily constructed that the reader could read it in any of
             several ways. Perhaps the writer has switched pronouns in mid – sentence, or has switched
             tenses, so the reader loses track of who is talking or when the action took place. Perhaps
             Sentence B is not a logical sequel to Sentence A—the writer, in whose head the connection is
             clear, has not bothered to provide the missing link. Perhaps the writer has used an important
             word incorrectly by not taking the trouble to look it up. He may think that ‘sanguine’ and
             ‘sanguinary’ mean the same thing, but the difference is a bloody big one. The reader can only
             infer (speaking of big differences) what the writer is trying to imply.
             Faced with these obstacles, the reader is at first a remarkably tenacious bird. He blames
             himself – he obviously’ ‘lacks’ something, and he goes back over mystifying sentence, or
             over the paragraph, piecing it out like an ancient rune making guesses and moving on. But
             he won’t do this for long. The writer must work hard, and the reader will look for one who
             is better at his craft. The writer, therefore, must constantly ask himself: What am I trying
             to say? Surprisingly often, he doesn’t know. Then he must look at what he has written
             and ask: Have I said it? Is it clear to someone encountering the subject for the first time? If
             it’s not, it is because some fuzz worked its way into the machinery. The writer is a person
             clear-headed enough to see this stuff for what it is—fuzz.
             I don’t mean that some people are born -clear-headed and are therefore, natural writers,
             whereas  others  are  naturally  fuzzy  and  ‘will  never  write  well.  Thinking  clearly  is  a
             conscious act that the writer must force upon himself, just as if he were embarking on any
             other project that requires logic: adding up a laundry list or doing an algebra problem.
             Good writing doesn’t come naturally, though most people obviously think it does.
             (Source: Internet/ William Zinsser, New York, Harper, 1998)


          12.4.1  General Guidelines

          There are certain general guidelines that have to be followed by all while formulating business
          correspondence:

          l    The major purpose of most business messages is to inform or persuade.
          l    Getting a strong mental picture of your receiver helps you tailor the message to the needs
               of a specific audience.
          l    Empathy helps you anticipate the receiver’s reaction to your message.
          l    “You attitude” increases clarity and builds relationships.

          l    Avoid sexist language.
          l    Avoid language that reflects bias for race and ethnic group, age, religion, and disability.
          l    Insincere compliments are detrimental to good communication.







                                           lovely Professional university                                   177
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187