Page 256 - DCOM204_AUDITING_THEORY
P. 256

Auditing Theory



                      Notes         auditor’s outside perspective can be quite valuable. The client (the person who commissions the
                                    audit), in contrast to the auditee, is accountable for the auditors’ actions and reports. Committees
                                    cannot generally perform this function; an audit boss should schedule the audits and make
                                    assignments. Finally, auditors must serve the organization’s needs. Business values are important
                                    and the auditors can assist by determining whether the enterprise is actually achieving its goals.


                                    Rule 2: Use Qualified People
                                    Auditors must be able to carry out their assignments in an impartial and objective fashion. This
                                    means that they cannot have a vested interest in the activity being audited. If they developed the
                                    rules, they cannot impartially evaluate the effectiveness and application of those rules. Although
                                    an auditor can never be totally independent of the auditee, some separation must be maintained.
                                    It’s fine to audit within your group, but you can’t audit your own job.

                                    Auditors must also be capable of doing their jobs. They need certain emotional, intellectual and
                                    mechanical skills, which they can obtain by attending a course, reading a book or observing
                                    others. Often, all three methods are used. In addition to knowing how to conduct an audit,
                                    auditors must be familiar with the technical processes being examined. A good way to demonstrate
                                    this familiarity is to flowchart the activity to be audited—if a person can’t flowchart it, he or she
                                    can’t audit it. Finally, auditors need to be able to communicate well, both orally and in writing.

                                    Rule 3: Measure against agreed criteria

                                    Auditors are not allowed to make up the rules—they must audit against performance standards
                                    that are already in place and accepted by the auditee. This is the planning part of the plan-do-
                                    check-act loop. The highest level of requirements includes corporate policies, management
                                    system standards and regulatory requirements. Usually originating from outside the auditee’s
                                    organization, these requirements establish the goals and objectives to be achieved. National
                                    and international standards, such as QS-9000 and ISO 9001, fall into this highest category. Next
                                    comes the local approach, often called a quality manual or quality plan, for implementing these
                                    high-level requirements. It gives the framework for achieving the concepts and should be fairly
                                    compact. This document is then followed by a number of process-specific procedures. Further
                                    detail can be provided in work instructions, such as drawings, traveler sheets and sampling
                                    plans. One of an auditor’s challenges is to obtain and become familiar with the many levels of
                                    requirements forming the basis for the audit.

                                    Rule 4: Use facts to Form Conclusions

                                    Auditing is fact-based; conclusions are drawn from the data. Facts can be good (a requirement
                                    was met) or bad (a requirement wasn’t met), but no judgment or opinion should taint them.
                                    These facts, also known as objective evidence, can come from five sources. They can be physical
                                    properties, such as flow rates and dimensions; sensory-derived input from seeing, hearing,
                                    smelling or tasting; documents or records; information drawn from interviews with auditee
                                    staff members; or patterns such as percentages or ratios. Auditors use checklists and other tools
                                    to determine the facts to be gathered, and then they perform the fieldwork to gather these facts.
                                     The output of the audit process, be it a management or compliance audit, is a report. The client
                                    (audit boss) receives the report from the auditor and delivers it to the auditee. To prepare a
                                    report, the auditor must take all of the positive and negative facts and make some sense of the
                                    data. In other words, the auditor must analyze the data.

                                     The first step is to list all of the positive and negative observations (data), then sort those data
                                    into controls or problem areas. Generally, there will be a large number of negative observations
                                    associated with just a few control items. This natural chunking of the data allows the auditor to



            250                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261