Page 184 - DMGT209_QUANTITATIVE_TECHNIQUES_II
P. 184

Unit 9: Attitude Measurement and Scaling Techniques



            The disadvantage of this method is that, if the interval between first and second test is more the  Notes
            scale will be less reliable.
            Second disadvantage is, it is difficult to convince the original respondents to take the test for
            second time.
            Third disadvantage is that, the second time answer may be influenced by the first time answer.
            Assume that, an opinion about the hospital service is asked. Two weeks later, if the same
            question is asked, the reply by respondent will be influenced by what was told the first time.

            Equivalent Forms Reliability

            In this method 2  “equivalent” scales are used to obtain consistent results. So, the researcher
            administer one scale to the respondent and 2 weeks later another scale, which is equivalent of
            the first one to the same respondent.
            The greatest problem of this method is to construct 2 scales that appear to be different but have
            similar effect. This alternative forms test is similar to the test-retest method, except that the test-
            retest method uses the same measuring instrument both the times.

            Internal Consistency

            In this method two or more measurement of the same concept is taken at the same time and then
            compares to see if they agree with each other. Suppose we use Likert scale and offer choices from
            strongly agree to strongly disagree to determine consumer attitude towards the service rendered
            by Big Bazar. Suppose the researcher prepares 4 statements scale to measure this:
            1.   I enjoy shopping at Big Bazar.
            2.   All my needs for my household are satisfied by shopping in Big Bazar.
            3.   Service provided to me by Big Bazar is excellent.
            4.   I like the front line salesman regarding the service rendered.
            The degree to which the 4 statements show correlation across a sample of respondents indicates
            the reliability of the measure. If correlation is high, then reliability will also be high.
            Methods to Improve Reliability
            i.   Number of measurements is to be increased. Instead of conducting one test, average
                 scores of several equivalent forms of the test is to be considered for reliability.
            ii.  Controls used for conducting the experiment must be good. Example, (a) measuring device
                 must be accurate. (b) The researcher who administers must be trained to avoid bias in
                 respondents.
            iii.  Items to be measured must be stated clearly.

            Validity

            The paradigm of validity focused in the question “Are we measuring, what we think, we are
            measuring”? Success of the scale lies in measuring “What is intended to be measured?” Of the
            two attributes of scaling, validity is the most important.

            There are several methods to check the validity of the scale used for measurement.
            1.   Construct Validity:  A sales manager believes that there is a clear relation between job
                 satisfaction for a person and the degree to which a person is an extrovert and the work
                 performance of his sales force. Therefore, those who enjoy high job satisfaction, and have




                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  179
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189