Page 357 - DCOM301_INCOME_TAX_LAWS_I
P. 357

Income Tax Laws – I




                    Notes            Two observations of the Apex Court in the above decision are noteworthy. Firstly, it
                                     observed that the definition of income in the 1922 Act did not originally include capital
                                     gains. It is only by an artificial and extended definition of the word “income” that capital
                                     gains have been brought under the purview of the Income-tax statute. In this context
                                     reference can also be made to the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Navinchandra
                                     Mafatlal v. CIT [1954] 26 ITR 758 given in the context of interpreting the word “income” in
                                     entry No. 54 in List-I of the Seventh Schedule to the Government of India Act, 1935. The
                                     Court held that the word should be given the widest connotation in view of the fact that it
                                     occurred in a Legislative head conferring the legislative power and that in that context it
                                     did not bear the same meaning as was ascribed to it in cases decided under the Income-tax
                                     statute but included capital gains. The next observation of the Apex Court made in the case
                                     of Sevantilal Maneklal Sheth (supra) that is note-worthy is that it is a sound rule of
                                     interpretation that statute should be as construed as to prevent the mischief and to advance
                                     the remedy according to the true intention of the makers of the statute. It is also to be
                                     noticed that while interpreting a statute the expression used should be given due importance
                                     and no part of the expression is rendered otiose. In this context the remarks of the Apex
                                     Court in the case of Padmaraje R. Kadambande [1992] 195 ITR 877 also deserved to be kept
                                     in mind.

                                     The Court observed that, “a statute cannot always be construed with the dictionary in one
                                     hand and the statute in the other. Regard must also be had to the scheme, context and – as
                                     in this case – to the legislative history of the provision.” Keeping this observation of the
                                     Apex Court in mind we are of the view that, notwithstanding the decision of the Delhi
                                     Bench of Tribunal cited supra, the word “investment income” used in section 115E does
                                     not include within its scope short-term capital gains. If this word is so construed as to
                                     include short-term capital gains within its scope the expression “income by way of long
                                     term capital gains or both” figuring in sections 115D and 115E would be rendered otiose.
                                     Income derived from an asset can be only of two types i.e., either income as normally
                                     construed or capital gains.
                                     The Act has consistently made a distinction between the short-term capital gains and long-
                                     term capital gains, both for applying the tax rates and set off of losses. If the benefit of the
                                     concessional tax rate is extended even to short-term capital gains by including the short-
                                     term capital gains within the scope of the expression “investment income” used in section
                                     115E such an approach would overlook the distinction consistently made in the Act between
                                     the short-term capital gains and long-term capital gains and also, as already observed,
                                     render the expression “long-term capital gains or both redundant”. In other words, if
                                     normal income and both the types of capital gains i.e., short-term and long-term are to be
                                     given benefit of concessional tax rate, the legislature could have stopped with using the
                                     expression ‘investment income’ in section 115E. It specifically restricted the concessional
                                     tax rate to long-term capital gains presumably with a specific purpose and that purpose
                                     appears to be the one mentioned by the learned D.R., i.e., to restrict the outflow of foreign
                                     exchange relatable to “hot money”. In other words, the benefit of concessional tax rate is
                                     extended only if a trader or investor is dedicated to the Indian market for a sufficiently
                                     long time and derives either income like dividends, interest on securities or derives long-
                                     term capital gains. The exclusion of short-term capital gains is to prevent short-term or
                                     speculative inflows and out-flows of foreign exchange.
                                     We may also refer to the provisions of section 204 the relevant portion of which reads as
                                     follows:
                                     For the purposes of this section:

                                     (a) “non-resident Indian” and “foreign exchange asset” shall have the meanings assigned
                                     to them in Chapter XII-A;”
                                                                                                         Contd...



          352                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362