Page 44 - DCOM302_MANAGEMENT_ACCOUNTING
P. 44

Unit 3: Analysis of Financial Statements




             Return on Assets                                                                   Notes
             Return on assets is a very good profitability ratio. It is comprehensive when compared
             to profit margin and asset turnover. Return on assets overcomes the deficiency of profit
             margin by relating the assets necessary to produce income and it overcomes the deficiency
             of asset turnover by taking into account the amount of income produced. Mathematically,
             return on assets is equal to net income divided by average total assets, or more simply put,
             profit margin times asset turnover. Ford can improve it’s overall profitability by increasing
             it’s  profit  margin,  the  asset  turnover,  or  both.  Looking  at  the  numbers,  it  was  actually
             Ford’s increase in profit margin that really gave it the boost it needed to raise the return on
             assets from the black to the red. A steady increase in return on assets from -1.3% in 1991 to
             an acceptable 2.2% in 1994 is a good sign to investors. This steady climb of 169% resulted
             in an overall increase in the earning power of Ford Motor Company. Ford’s increase in
             profitability  shows  satisfactory  earning  power  which  results  in  investors  continuing  to
             provide capital to it.
             Debt to Equity
             The  debt  to  equity  ratio  shows  the  portion  of  the  company  financed  by  creditors  in
             comparison to that financed by the stockholders. It is total liabilities divided by stockholder’s
             equity. Ford’s debt to equity ratio is relatively high. When measuring profitability, a high
             debt to equity ratio means the company has high debt and must earn more profit to protect
             the payment of interest to it’s creditors. This high debt to equity ratio would also interest
             stockholders because it shows what part of the business is financed through borrowing or
             in other words, is debt financed. Of the five years we analyzed, the lowest debt to equity
             ratio was during 1991 (6.65) and the highest was in 1993 (11.71). In comparison to return
             on assets, a higher creditor financed year such as 1991 did not have an positive effect on
             profitability. It seemed that through increased borrowing in 1993, a higher debt to equity
             ratio was produced, but overall profitability also went up. Debt to equity is only one part
             in a full profitability analysis. The only real information that the debt to equity ratio can
             produce is it can show how much expansion is possible through the borrowing of long-
             term funds; basically it show’s a company’s long-term solvency. A higher debt to equity
             ratio essentially means that the company will be able to borrow less money. The company
             must rely more on stockholder investment. Ford was able to lower it’s borrowing of funds
             from 1993 through 1994 and into 1995, while still effectively increasing it’s profit margin
             and return on assets. This means Ford was able to use stockholder’s investments to increase
             it’s profitability rather than borrow the funds to do it.
             Return on Equity
             Return on equity is the ratio of net income divided by the average stockholder’s equity. This
             ratio is of great interest to stockholders because it shows how much they have earned on
             their investment in the business. In the years of 1991 and 1992, stockholders lost money on
             their investment in Ford Motor Company. No one likes to lose money, even if it is a couple
             of cents on the dollar. A major stockholder could incur quite a loss because of this. In the
             next three years, return on equity was on the positive side, the peak being in 1994 when
             stockholders earned about 28% on every dollar invested. Quite a good return considering
             some investors are happy with a steady 8% return. Considering the previous years, the
             return on equity for Ford seems to be positive. Common knowledge dictates that most
             companies experience a downturn every now and then. Ford’s investors are able to remain
             invested in the company because it’s overall 5 year return on equity is high enough to give
             investors the high returns they seek. A return on equity consistently above 16% with a few
             negative years mixed in is certainly lucrative enough to maintain a strong profitability
             measurement and project a positive image to the investors of Ford Motor Company.
                                                                                 Contd…





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    39
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49