Page 123 - DMGT405_FINANCIAL%20MANAGEMENT
P. 123

Unit 6: Cost of Capital



                                      Exhibit 5: Dr. Bhatt’s Analysis                             Notes

              Subject: Nike’s Cost of Capital
              Based on the following assumptions, my estimate of Nike’s cost of capital is 8.4 percent:
              Single or Multiple Costs of Capital

              The first question I considered was whether to use single or multiple costs of capital given
              that Nike has multiple business segments. Aside from footwear, which makes up 62 per
              cent of revenue. Nike  also sells apparel (30 per cent  of revenue)  that complement its
              footwear products. In addition, Nike sells sport balls, time-pieces, eyewear, skates, bats
              and other  equipment designed  for sports  activities. Equipment  products account  for
              3.6 per cent of revenue. Finally, Nike also sells some non-Nike branded products such as
              Cole-Haan dress and casual footwear, and ice stakes, skate blades, hockey sticks, hockey
              jerseys and other  products under the Bauer trademark, non-Nike  brands account for
              4.5 per cent of the revenue.
              I asked myself, whether Nike’s different business segments shad enough risks from each
              other to warrant different costs of capital. Were their profiles really different? I concluded
              that it was only the Cole-Haan line that was somewhat different: the rest were all sports-
              related businesses. However, since Cole-Haan makes up only a tiny fraction of the revenues,
              I did not think it necessary to compute a separate cost of capital. As for the apparel and
              footwear lines, they are sold through the same marketing and distribution channels and
              are often marketed in “collections” of similar design. I believe, they face the same risk
              factors, as such, I decided to compute only one cost of capital of the whole company.

              Methodology for Calculating the Cost of Capital; WACC
              Since Nike is funded with both debt and equity, I used the Weighted Average Cost of
              Capital (WACC) method. Based on the latest available balance sheet, debt as a proportion
              of total capital makes up 27.0 per cent and equity accounts for 73.0 per cent:
                   Capital sources                  Book Values

                   Debt
                   Current portion of long-term debt      $ 5.4
                   Notes payable                          855.3

                   Long-term debt                         435.9
                                                       $ 1.291.2   27.0% of total capital
                                                       $ 3.494.5   72.0% of total capital

              Cost of Debt
              My estimate of Nike’s cost of debt is 4.3 per cent. I arrived at this estimate by taking total
              interest expense for the year 2001 and dividing it by the company’s average debt balance.
              The rare is lower than Treasury yields but that is because Nike raised a portion of its
              funding  needs through Japanese yen notes, which carry rates  between 2.0 per cent to
              4.3 per cent.
              After adjusting for tax, the cost of debt comes to 2.7 per cent. I used a tax rate of 38 per cent,
              which I obtained by adding state taxes of 3 per cent to the U.S. statutory tax rate. Historically,
              Nike’s state taxes have ranged from 2.5 per cent to 3.5 per cent.
                                                                                  Contd...



                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  117
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128