Page 148 - DCOM308_DCOM502_INDIRECT_TAX_LAWS
P. 148

Unit 8: Custom Duties




                                                                                                Notes
             

             Caselet     ABB Ltd. v. CCEx. 2009 (15) S.T.R. 23 (Tri. - LB)

                n the instant case, Revenue contended that in the inclusive clause of the definition of
                "input service" under rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit  Rules, 2004, it is specifically
             Imentioned that  only  outward transportation up  to the place of  removal shall  be
             included. Therefore, credit for outward transportation from the place of removal to the
             customer's place should not be allowed with reference to any other limb or category of the
             definition of input service which is general in nature. However, the large Bench of the
             Tribunal rejected the contention of the Revenue.
             The Tribunal held that each of the limbs of the definition of "input services" is an independent
             benefit/concession. If an assessee can satisfy any one of the above, then credit on input
             service would be admissible even if the assessee does not satisfy the other limbs.
             The expression "activities relating to business" admittedly covers transportation upto the
             customers place and, therefore, credit cannot be denied by relying on specific coverage of
             outward transportation upto the place of removal in the inclusive clause.
             Revenue further alleged that since the cost of outward transportation did not form part of
             the transaction value of the manufactured goods, any service tax paid for the outward
             transportation of  goods from  place of  removal could  not be  allowed as credit to  the
             manufacturer. In this regard  the Tribunal clarified that  for admissibility of credit  for
             outward transportation, there is no requirement that the cost of freight should enter into
             the transaction value of the manufactured goods. The two issues, namely, 'valuation' and
             'CENVAT credit' are independent of each other and have no relevance to each other.

             Hence, it inferred that the services availed by a manufacturer for outward transportation
             of final products from the place of removal should be treated as an input service and
             thereby enabling the manufacturer to take credit of the service tax paid on the value of
             such services.

          Source:  http://220.227.161.86/20925frpubcd_bos1.pdf

          8.9 Summary


              The Customs Act was formulated in 1962 to prevent illegal imports and exports of goods.
              Duties of customs are levied on goods imported or exported from India at the rate specified
               under the Customs Tariff Act.

              For the purpose of exercising proper surveillance over imports and exports,
              The Central Government has the power to notify the ports and airports for the unloading
               of the imported goods and loading of the exported goods,

              The places for clearance of goods imported or to be exported, the routes by which above
               goods may pass by land or inland water into or out of Indian and the ports which alone
               shall be coastal ports.
              The different duties under custom duty in India include basic  duty, additional  duty
               (countervailing duty), anti-dumping duty, protective duty, export duty.
              In bearing with the main objective of the customs duty, any goods which are imported or
               attempted to be imported and exported or attempted to  be exported,  contrary to  any




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   143
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153