Page 153 - DCOM308_DCOM502_INDIRECT_TAX_LAWS
P. 153

Indirect Tax Laws




                    Notes          the costs of packing and containers, assists, royalties and license fees. The rules exclude buying
                                   commissions and special discounts obtained by sole agents and sole concessionaires from being
                                   taken into account in arriving at dutiable value.
                                   The Tokyo Round Agreement  strictly limited  the discretion available to  Customs  to  reject
                                   transaction value to the small  number of  cases. This was a  matter of  concern to  numerous
                                   developing countries. They considered that the rule unduly inhibited the ability of their customs
                                   administrations to deal with the traders’ practice of undervaluing imported goods in order to
                                   reduce incidence on duties. This was one reason for the reluctance of a large number of developing
                                   countries to accede to the Agreement in the pre-WTO period.

                                   The Decision Regarding Cases where  Customs Administrations Have Reasons to Doubt the
                                   Truth or Accuracy of the Declared Value (also known as the Decision on Shifting the Burden of
                                   Proof), adopted as a result of the initiative taken by developing countries during the Uruguay
                                   Round, corrects this lacuna. The Tokyo Round Agreement placed the burden of proof on Customs
                                   if it rejected the transaction value declared by the importer. The Uruguay Round decision shifts
                                   the burden of proof on to the importers when Customs, on the basis of the information on prices
                                   and other data available to it, “has reason to doubt the truth or accuracy of the particulars or of
                                   documents produced in support” of declarations made by the importers.



                                     Did u know?  The basic rule of the Agreement is that the value for customs purposes should
                                     be based on the price actually  paid or payable when sold for export to the country of
                                     importation (e.g. the invoice  price), adjusted,  where  appropriate, to include  certain
                                     payments made by buyers such as the costs of packing and containers, assists, royalties
                                     and license fees.
                                   In order to ensure that the transaction value is rejected by Customs in such cases on an objective
                                   basis, the Agreement on Customs Valuation stipulates that national legislation should provide
                                   certain rights to importers. First, where Customs expresses doubts as to the truth or accuracy of
                                   a declared value, importers should have a right to provide an explanation, including documents
                                   or other evidence to prove that  the value  declared by  them reflects  the correct value of the
                                   imported goods. Second, where Customs is not satisfied with the explanations given, importers
                                   should have a right to ask Customs to communicate to them in writing its reasons for doubting
                                   the truth or accuracy of the declared value. This provision is intended to safeguard the interests
                                   of importers, by giving them the right to appeal against the decision to higher authorities and,
                                   if necessary, to a tribunal or other independent body, within the customs administration.
                                   The rule that transaction values declared by importers should be used for valuation of goods
                                   applies not only to arms-length transactions but also to transactions between related parties. In
                                   the latter transactions, which generally take place among transnational corporations and their
                                   subsidiaries or affiliates, prices are charged  on the basis of transfer pricing which may  not
                                   always reflect the correct or true value of the imported goods. Even in such cases, the Agreement
                                   requires Customs to enter into consultations with the importer, in order to ascertain the type of
                                   relationship, the circumstances surrounding the transaction and whether the relationship has
                                   influenced the price.  If Customs  after such examination finds that the  relationship has  not
                                   influenced the declared prices, the transaction value is to be determined on the basis of those
                                   prices.
                                   Further, in order to ensure that in practice the transaction value is not rejected simply on the
                                   grounds that the parties are related, the Agreement gives importers the right to demand that the
                                   value should be accepted when they demonstrate that the value approximates the test values
                                   arrived at on the basis of:






          148                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158