Page 239 - DCOM404_CORPORATE_LEGAL_FRAMEWORK
P. 239

Corporate Legal Framework




                    Notes
                                     1879, Engels complained that the trade unions had led the working class into a dead end.
                                     “No attempt should be made to conceal the fact that at this moment a genuine workers’
                                     movement in the continental sense is non-existent here, and hence I don’t believe you will
                                     miss much if, for the time being, you don’t get any reports on the doings of the TRADE
                                     UNIONS here.”
                                     In an article written six years later, in which he contrasted the England of 1885 to that of
                                     1845, Engels made no attempt to conceal his contempt for the conservative role played
                                     by the trade unions. Forming an aristocracy within the working class, they cultivated the
                                     friendliest relations with the employers, in order to secure for themselves a comfortable
                                     position. The trade unionists, Engels wrote with scathing sarcasm, “are very nice people
                                     indeed nowadays to deal with, for any sensible capitalist in particular and for the whole
                                     capitalist class in general.”
                                     But the trade unions had all but ignored the great mass of the working class, for whom
                                     “the state of misery and insecurity in which they live now is as low as ever, if not lower.
                                     The East-end of London is an ever-spreading pool of stagnant misery and desolation, of
                                     starvation when out of work, and degradation, physical and moral, when in work.”

                                     Engels’ hopes were aroused, toward the end of the 1880s, by the development of a new
                                     and militant trade union movement among more exploited sections of the working class.
                                     Socialists, including Eleanor Marx, were active in this new movement. Engels responded
                                     to these developments with enthusiasm, and noted with great satisfaction that “These new
                                     Trades Unions of unskilled men and women are totally different from the old organizations
                                     of the working-class aristocracy and cannot fall into the same conservative ways ... And
                                     they are organized under quite different circumstances all the leading men and women
                                     are Socialists, and socialist agitators too. In them I see the real beginning of the movement
                                     here.”

                                     But Engels’ hopes were not fulfilled. It was not too long before these “new” unions began

                                     to exhibit the same conservative tendencies as the old ones. This was an early verifi cation
                                     of the theoretical conception we consider critical to the analysis of the trade unions i.e., that
                                     the essential character of these organizations is not determined by the social position and
                                     status of the particular sections of workers organized within them. These are factors, which,
                                     at most, only influence certain secondary aspects of trade union policy perhaps making

                                     some unions more or less militant than the average. Yet, in the final analysis, the trade

                                     union form, whose structure is drawn from, and embedded in, the social and production
                                     relations of capitalism, and, we must add, the nation-state framework, exercises the decisive

                                     influence that determines the orientation of its “content” the working class membership.
                                     The theory of modern Socialism is inseparable from the constructive thought of Karl Marx.
                                     The theory of modern Socialism does not admit of arbitrarily constructed Utopian ideals.
                                     The philosophical basis of Marxian Socialism is a synthesis of the theories of the economic
                                     interpretation of history, of the class-struggle and of surplus value.

                                   2.   Webb’s Theory of Industrial Democracy: Webb’s book ‘Industrial democracy’ is the Bible
                                       of trade unionism. According to Webb, trade unionism is an extension of democracy from
                                       political sphere to industrial sphere. Webb agreed with Marx that trade unionism is a class
                                       struggle and modern capitalist state is a transitional phase which will lead to democratic
                                       socialism. He considered collective bargaining as the process which strengthens labour.
                                   3.   Cole’s Theory of Union Control of Industry: Cole’s views are given in his book “World
                                       of Labour”, 1913. His views are somewhere in between Webb and Marx. He agrees that
                                       unionism is class struggle and the ultimate is the control of industry by labour and not
                                       revolution as predicted by Marx.





          234                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244