Page 246 - DCOM404_CORPORATE_LEGAL_FRAMEWORK
P. 246

Unit 11: Trade Union Act, 1926




          11.5.4 Measures to Minimize the evil Effects of Outside Leadership                    Notes

          In view of the limitations of outside leadership, it is desirable to replace the outside leaders
          progressively by the internal leaders. The National Commission on Labour, 1969, also stated that
          outsiders in the Trade Unions should be made redundant by forces from within rather than by
          legal means.
          Both the management and trade unions should take steps in this direction. The steps may be:
          1.   Management should ensure that the victimisation will be at zero level, even if the trade
               unions are led by insiders;
          2.   Extensive training facilities in the areas of leadership skills and management techniques
               and programmes should be provided to the workers;
          3.   Special leave should be sanctioned to the offi ce-bearers.

          Union rivalry has been the result of the following factors:
          1.   The desire of political parties to have their bases among the industrial workers;
          2.   Personal-cum-factional politics of the local union leaders;
          3.   Domination of unions by outside leaders;

          4.   Attitude and policies of the management, i.e., divide and rule policy; and
          5.   The weak legal framework of trade unions.
               (a)   Measures to minimise Union Rivalry: In view of the evil effects of inter-union rivalry
                    and the problem of formation of one union in one industry, it may be necessary to
                    consider the recommendations of the National Commission on Labour, 1969. The
                    recommendations of NCL to minimise union rivalry are:

                    (i)   Elimination of party politics and outsiders through building up of internal
                         leaders
                    (ii)   Promotion of collective bargaining through recognition of sole bargaining
                         agents
                    (iii)  Improving the system of union recognition
                    (iv)  Encouraging union security
                    (v)   Empowering labour courts to settle inter-union disputes if they are not settled
                         within the organisation.
               (b)   Multiple unions: Multiple unionism, both at the plant and industry levels, poses a
                    serious threat to industrial peace and harmony in India. The situation of multiple
                    unions is said to prevail when two or more unions in the same plant or industry try
                    to assert rival claims over each other and function with overlapping jurisdiction.
                    The multiple unions exist due to the existence of crafts unions and formations of
                    two or more unions in the industry. Multiple unionism is not a phenomenon
                    unique to India. It exists even in advanced countries like UK and the USA. Multiple
                    unionism affects the industrial relations system both positively and negatively. It is,
                    sometimes, desirable for the democratic health of labour movement. It encourages
                    a healthy competition and acts as a check to the adoption of undemocratic practice,
                    authoritative structure and autocratic leadership. However, the negative impacts of
                    multiple unions dominate the positive impacts. The nature of competition tends to
                    convert itself into a sense of unfair competition resulting in inter-union rivalry. The
                    rivalry destroys the feeling of mutual trust and cooperation among leadership. It is a





                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   241
   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251