Page 30 - DCOM404_CORPORATE_LEGAL_FRAMEWORK
P. 30

Unit 1: Laws of Contract




             claimed £100 from the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company. They ignored two letters from her   Notes
             husband, who had trained as a solicitor. On a third request for her reward, they replied with
             an anonymous letter that if it is used properly the company had complete confidence in the

             smoke ball’s efficacy, but “to protect themselves against all fraudulent claims” they would

             need her to come to their office to use the ball each day and checked by the secretary.

             Mrs. Carlill brought a claim to court. The barristers representing her argued that the
             advertisement and her reliance on it was a contract between her and the company, and so
             they ought to pay. The company argued it was not a serious contract.
             Question

             Do you agree to what the company says? Justify.
             (Hint: summarize this case in your word.)


          1.9 Breach of Contract

          A contract terminates by breach of contract. If the promisor has not performed his promise in
          accordance with the terms of the contract or where the performance is not excused by tender,
          mutual consent or impossibility or operation of law, then this amounts to a breach of contract on
          the part of the promisor. The consequence of this is that the promisee becomes entitled to certain
          remedies. The breach of contract may arise in two ways: (i) anticipatory and (ii) actual.

          1.9.1 Anticipatory Breach of Contracts

          The anticipatory breach of contract occurs when a party repudiates it before the time fi xed for
          performance has arrived or when a party by his own act disables himself from performing the
          contract.

                 Example: A contracts to supply B with certain articles on 1st August. On 20th July,
          he informs B that he will not be able to supply the goods. B is entitled to sue A for breach of
          promise.
          The anticipatory breach is also known as ‘breach by repudiation’. Repudiation is a clear statement
          by one party before performance is due that it cannot or will not perform a material part of the
          contract obligation. Suppose that the day before your friend was to pick up the fiat that you are

          promised to sell him, you sent your friend a message that you decided to sell the car to someone
          else. That would be repudiation or anticipatory breach. It also would be repudiation if your
          friend heard from another reliable source that you sold the car to someone else (There would be
          no reason to believe that you would get it back to sell the car to your friend tomorrow). However,
          it is not repudiation if one party will not perform because of an honest disagreement over the
          contract’s terms.

          Consequence of Anticipatory Breach

          Where a party to a contract refuses to perform his part of the contract before the actual time
          arrives, the promisee may either (i) rescind the contract and treat the contract as at an end, and
          at once sue for damages, or (ii) he may elect not to rescind but to treat the contract operative and
          wait for the time of performance and then hold the other party liable for the consequences of non-
          performance. In the latter case, the party who has repudiated may still perform if he can.
          The anticipatory breach of contract does not by itself discharges the contract. The contract is
          discharged only when the aggrieved party accepts the repudiation of the contract, i.e., elects to
          rescind the contract. Thus, if the repudiation is not accepted and subsequently an event happens




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    25
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35