Page 228 - DECO201_MACRO_ECONOMICS_ENGLISH
P. 228

Unit 13: Macro Economic Policies: Monetary Policy




          If there is an exogenous increase in money supply from M  to M , then, given the demand for  Notes
                                                          1    2
          money (liquidity preference), the rate  of interest is reduced. With a  reduction in the rate of
          interest, from r  to r , the investment demand is stimulated. As investment increases, from I  to
                      1   2                                                         1
          I , the level of real income increases from Y  to Y  through the multiplier effect.
           2                                 1    2
          Exactly in the same way, a decrease in money supply is followed by a rise in the rate of interest—
          a fall in investment expenditure and therefore, a fall in real income. In order that this mechanism
          works, we need to assume (a) the absence of ‘liquidity trap’, (b) the interest elasticity of investment
          and (c) the operation of ‘multiplier effect’. If the economy is caught in the ‘liquidity trap’ (i.e., a
          perfectly elastic liquidity preference over a range), a given change in money supply cannot just
          induce any change in the rate of interest; the interest rate gets so rigidly pegged to an institutional
          minimum that it does not change. As if, a horse is taken to the water (money supply is changed),
          but he does not drink water (it has no influence on the rate of interest in the money market).
          Interest rate may be insensitive to monetary policy also because of a simultaneous shift in the
          liquidity  preference  curve  when there is a change in  the quantity  of  money  exogenously
          determined. Even if interest rate is responsive to money supply, there is no guarantee that the
          level of investment (demand for capital) will be interest elastic. If interest charges do not account
          for a major part of the total costs of investment or if investment activity is determined by factors
          other than costs (factors such as the size of market, location, government patronage, expected
          returns,  etc.), then it is  possible that investment becomes  interest inelastic. In fact, empirical
          observation suggests such interest inelasticity of investment.
          Finally, even if interest is money sensitive and investment is interest elastic, monetary policy
          may not generate income changes because the so-called investment multiplier may not operate.


                 Example: If the economy is characterised by full employment and  absence of  excess
          capacity or if the marginal propensity to consume is very high, multiplier mechanism may not
          work; in that case, a rise in investment may increase only prices but not real income. Excess
          investment may generate demand-pull inflation and to that extent the expansion in real income
          (following cheap money policy) may suffer.

          13.3.1 Monetary Policy in Developing Economy

          Developments in monetary policy closely mirror the changes in overall economic policy. The
          decade of 1990s has seen far reaching changes in India’s economic policy. In developed countries,
          after decades of eclipse, monetary policy re-emerged as a potent instrument of economic policy,
          in the fight against inflation in the 1980s. The relative importance of growth and price stability
          as the objective of monetary policy as well as the appropriate intermediate target of monetary
          policy became the focus of attention.
          A similar  trend regarding monetary policy  is discernible  in developing  economies as  well.
          Much of the early literature on development economics focused on real factors such as savings,
          investment  and technology  as mainsprings  of growth.  Very little  attention was paid to the
          financial system as a contributory factor to economic growth even though attention was paid to
          develop financial institutions which provide short term  and long  term credit.  In fact,  many
          writers felt that inflation was endemic in the process of economic growth and it was accordingly
          treated more as a consequence of structural imbalance than as a monetary phenomenon. However,
          with the accumulated evidence, it became clear that any process of economic growth in which
          monetary expansion was disregarded led to inflationary pressures with a consequent impact on
          economic growth. Accordingly, the importance of price stability and, therefore, the need to use
          monetary  policy  for  that  purpose  also  assumed  importance  in  developing  economies.
          Nonetheless,  the debate  on the extent to which price stability should  be deemed to be  the
          overriding objective of monetary policy in such economies continues.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   223
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233