Page 82 - DMGT302_FUNDAMENTALS_OF_PROJECT_MANAGEMENT
P. 82

Unit 4: Project Budgeting



            Mathematical formulas that predict a single rate of return or “best estimate” are not enough. The  Notes
            author’s approach emphasizes the nature and processing of the data used and specific combinations
            of variables like cash flow, return on investment, and risk to estimate the odds for each potential
            outcome. Managers can examine the added information provided in this way to rate more
            accurately the chances of substantial gain in their ventures. The article, originally presented in
            1964, continues to interest HBR readers. In a retrospective commentary, the author discusses the
            now routine use of risk analysis in business and government, emphasizing that the method
            can—and should—be used in any decision-requiring situations in our uncertain world.
            Of all the decisions that business executives must make, none is more challenging—and none
            has received more attention—than choosing among alternative capital investment opportunities.
            What makes this kind of decision so demanding, of course, is not the problem of projecting
            return on investment under any given set of assumptions. The difficulty is in the assumptions
            and in their impact. Each assumption involves its own degree—often a high degree—of
            uncertainty; and, taken together, these combined uncertainties can multiply into a total
            uncertainty of critical proportions. This is where the element of risk enters, and it is in the
            evaluation of risk that the executive has been able to get little help from currently available
            tools and techniques.

            There is a way to help the executive sharpen key capital investment decisions by providing him
            or her with a realistic measurement of the risks involved. Armed with this gauge, which evaluates
            the risk at each possible level of return, he or she is then in a position to measure more
            knowledgeably alternative courses of action against corporate objectives.

            Need for New Concept

            The evaluation of a capital investment project starts with the principle that the productivity of
            capital is measured by the rate of return we expect to receive over some future period. A dollar
            received next year is worth less to us than a dollar in hand today. Expenditures three years hence
            are less costly than expenditures of equal magnitude two years from now. For this reason we
            cannot calculate the rate of return realistically unless we take into account (a) when the sums
            involved in an investment are spent and (b) when the returns are received.
            Comparing alternative investments is thus complicated by the fact that they usually differ not
            only in size but also in the length of time over which expenditures will have to be made and
            benefits returned.
            These facts of investment life long ago made apparent the shortcomings of approaches that
            simply averaged expenditures and benefits, or lumped them, as in the number-of-years-to-pay-
            out method. These shortcomings stimulated students of decision making to explore more precise
            methods for determining whether one investment would leave a company better off in the long
            run than would another course of action.
            It is not surprising, then, that much effort has been applied to the development of ways to
            improve our ability to discriminate among investment alternatives. The focus of all of these
            investigations has been to sharpen the definition of the value of capital investments to the
            company. The controversy and furor that once came out in the business press over the most
            appropriate way of calculating these values have largely been resolved in favor of the discounted
            cash flow method as a reasonable means of measuring the rate of return that can be expected in
            the future from an investment made today.
            Thus we have methods which are more or less elaborate mathematical formulas for comparing
            the outcomes of various investments and the combinations of the variables that will affect the
            investments. As these techniques have progressed, the mathematics involved has become more
            and more precise, so that we can now calculate discounted returns to a fraction of a percent.




                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   77
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87