Page 77 - DMGT407Corporate and Business Laws
P. 77

Corporate and Business Laws




                    Notes
                                          (b)  Canadian producers/processors were vulnerable to trade challenges in a
                                               fragmented system.
                                          (c)  Gaps resulting from non-inspection or non-rigorous inspection were perceived
                                               by processors as a weak link, despite the small percentage of overall production
                                               represented and assurances outlined in the Auditor General of Canada’s 1994
                                               Report.
                                          (d)  Closer integration of the US and Canadian markets under free trade agreements
                                               made the industry anxious to reduce the costs and inefficiencies resulting
                                               from differing provincial standards e.g. fluid milk.
                                     5.   The “national treatment” principle in the North American Free Trade Agreement
                                          could be interpreted to mean that imports must meet the provincial standard of the
                                          province they enter rather than the standard required for inter-provincial or
                                          international trade. This could drag down Canadian food standards to the lowest
                                          common denominator.
                                          (a)  Canadian exporters were concerned about being denied access to external
                                               markets on the grounds that Canadian food safety standards and inspection
                                               systems were not equivalent to those of the markets into which they were
                                               shipping.
                                          (b)  The 1994 SPS Agreement required that countries use their food safety and
                                               animal, plant and health regulations only to the extent necessary to protect
                                               human, animal life or health, not for trade protection purposes.
                                     6.   Emergence of alternatives to high-cost prescriptive regulation: New scientific and
                                          technological tools furnished the Government with opportunities to shift additional
                                          costs and a significant degree of responsibility for food safety to the food industry
                                          itself. Risk assessment methods allowed the allocation of food inspection resources
                                          on a risk basis. One such risk-based tool, the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
                                          (HACCP) system, developed for the US space program, was deemed more effective
                                          than existing systems in ensuring food safety. Canada was the first government to
                                          adopt this system, for its fish inspection program. It was so well accepted
                                          internationally that Canadian meat packing plants were subsequently required to
                                          conform to US regulations requiring large American meat packing plants to
                                          implement a HACCP plan by January 1998.

                                     7.   National unity was threatened, and solutions suggested in the winning Liberal
                                          platforms in the 1993 and 1997 elections were renewal of the federation, including
                                          better coordination of services and reduction in overlap and duplication among
                                          governments.
                                          The Government of Canada consolidated all of its food inspection and quarantine
                                          services from Health Canada, Fisheries and Oceans, and Agriculture and Agri-Food
                                          Canada into one self-standing Agency effective April 1, 1997. The Agency reports
                                          not to a deputy minister but directly to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food.
                                          The Agency has separate employer status, and so can hire and fire its own employees,
                                          rather than working through the Public Service Commission. It also has a number
                                          of financial flexibilities not available to government departments, most notably the
                                          capacity to retain revenues.
                                          Protecting the public interest is a major concern in creating alternate Service Delivery
                                          Agencies (ASDs) in Canada. Employing the Auditor General of Canada’s definition
                                                                                                         Contd...



          70                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82