Page 88 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 88

Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills




                    Notes          Assume the close

                                   Salespeople use an ‘assume – the – close technique’ frequently. After having a general discussion
                                   about the needs and positions of the buyer, often the seller will take out a large order form and
                                   start to complete it. The seller usually begins by asking for the buyer’s name and address before
                                   moving on to more serious points (e.g., price, model). When using this technique, negotiators
                                   do not ask the other party if he or she would like to make a purchase. Rather, they act as if the
                                   decision to purchase something has already been made so they might as well start to get the
                                   paperwork out of the way.
                                   Split the Difference


                                   Splitting the difference is perhaps the most popular closing tactic. The negotiator using this
                                   tactic will typically give a brief summary of the negotiation (We both have spent a lot of time,
                                   made many concessions, etc.) and then suggest that, because things are so close, “why don’t we
                                   just split the difference?” While this can be an effective closing tactic, it does presume that the
                                   parties started with fair opening offers. A negotiator who uses an exaggerated opening offer and
                                   suggests a split-the-difference close is using a hardball tactic.

                                   Exploding Offers

                                   An exploding offer contains an extremely tight deadline in order to pressure the other party to
                                   agree quickly. For example, a person who has interviewed for a job  may be  offered a very
                                   attractive salary and benefits package, but also be told that the offer will expire in 24 hours. The
                                   purpose of the exploding offer is to convince the other party to accept the settlement and to stop
                                   considering alternatives. This is particularly effective in situations where the party receiving
                                   the exploding offer is still in the process of developing alternatives that may or may not turn out
                                   to be viable (such as the job candidate who is still interviewing with other firms). People can feel
                                   quite uncomfortable about receiving exploding offer, however, because they feel as if they are
                                   under unfair pressure. Exploding offer appears to work best for organizations  that have the
                                   resources to make an exceptionally attractive offer early in a negotiation in order to prevent the
                                   other party from continuing to search for a potentially superior offer.

                                   Sweeteners

                                   Another closing tactics is to save a special concession for the close. The other negotiator told,
                                   “I’ll give you X if you agree to the deal.” For instance, when selling a condo, the owner could
                                   agree to include the previously excluded curtains, appliances, or light fixtures to close the deal.
                                   To use this tactic effectively,  however, negotiators  need to  include the  sweetener in  their
                                   negotiation plans or they may concede too much during the close.
                                   A negotiation, it can tip the balance of his or her behaviour away from  cooperation towards
                                   competition, resulting in impasses and lose-lose outcomes.

                                   Wise – Pie-slicing

                                   The distribution of resources (pie-slicing) is an unavoidable and inevitable aspect of negotiation.
                                   What qualities should we live by when slicing the pie?

                                   Consistency

                                   One of the hallmarks of a good pie-slicing heuristic is consistency or invariance across setting,
                                   time and respect to the enforcer of the procedure.



          82                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93