Page 141 - DMGT525_MATERIALS_MANAGEMENT
P. 141

Materials Management




                    Notes          Value analysis is a methodical approach to sharpening the efficiency and effectiveness of any
                                   process. Often, businesses apply it to the processes used in product creation or service delivery.
                                   Paramount to the value analysis is the practice of breaking down a process into each individual
                                   component and considering ways to improve that component’s value as measured by cost and
                                   importance to the process.

                                   10.1 Concept of Value and Value Analysis

                                   Concepts of value and value analysis are explained below:

                                   10.1.1 Value

                                   The value of a product will be interpreted in different ways by different customers. Its common
                                   characteristic is a high level of performance, capability, emotional appeal, style, etc. relative to
                                   its cost. This can also be expressed as maximizing the function of a product relative to its cost:
                                                 Value = (Performance + Capability)/Cost = Function/Cost

                                   Value is not a matter of minimizing cost. In some cases the value of a product can be increased
                                   by increasing its function (performance or capability) and cost as long as the added function
                                   increases more than its added cost. The concept of functional worth can be important. Functional
                                   worth is the lowest cost to provide a given function. However, there are less tangible “selling”
                                   functions involved in a product to make it of value to a customer.



                                     Did u know? For the sustained growth of an organization, it is an undisputed fact that the
                                     gap between the Price and Cost of production, i.e. the Profit margin should be widened as
                                     far as possible without any binding limits.
                                   In any system
                                   PRICE PR (N) = COST C(N) + PROFIT P(N)
                                   Where PR(N), C(N), & P(N) are the price, cost and profit of the Nth manufacturer, such that
                                   PR (N) = C(N) + P(N) = C(N+1)

                                   Where, C (N+1) is the cost to the (N+1)th user or buyer.
                                   If the (N+1)th end user is willing to pay C(N+1), it is in the interest of the manufacturer N to
                                   reduce C(N) so that P(N) can be increased for him, provided of course that Performance, Reliability
                                   and Quality of the item remains constant, or improved further, if possible. To achieve the above
                                   end, there are four approaches available.
                                   (a)  Keeping the Cost of Production C(N) constant, increase the selling price PR(N). This has
                                       got its own repercussions on the market demand pattern, and any price enhancement is
                                       normally linked up with a fail in demand.
                                   (b)  Keeping the Selling Price PR(N) constant, reduce the cost of production, by using various
                                       conventional methods of  cost  reduction,  like Method  Study, Material Management,
                                       Preventive Maintenance, and many other Productivity Techniques. It has been observed
                                       that more often than not, such a cost reduction approach has resulted in a substandard
                                       quality product which again had been rejected in competitive market, in favor of a better
                                       performing alternative.

                                   (c)  The third alternative is a simultaneous combination of the above two steps.





          136                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146