Page 172 - DMGT554_RETAIL_BUYING
P. 172

Unit 11: Wholesale Purchasing and Negotiation with Vendors




          Self Assessment                                                                       Notes

          State whether the following statements are true or false:
          7.   The climax of a successful buying plan is the active negotiations.
          8.   A trade discount sometimes referred to as a functional discount.

          9.   Trade discounts are illegal.
          11.4 Negotiation Strategies


          Whether you’re negotiating over chores with a spouse or salary with an employer, the way in
          which you approach the discussion dictates how successful you are. If you’re too timid, you may
          give in too quickly and end up making an unfair deal for yourself. This may also lead the other
          party — and even onlookers — to consider they can walk all over you. On the other hand, if
          you’re too stubborn and unrelenting, you may provoke the other side to walk away from the
          negotiation. This causes the deal to fall through, leaving everyone involved permanently bitter.

          Nevertheless, depending on the emotions and the parties involved, sometimes it may be more
          appropriate to lean one way or the other. A soft approach to negotiation refers to being generally
          more willing to give in, make concessions, trust the other, and stay honest and forthright with
          one’s situation. A hard approach is the conflicting. It means keeping a hard line, being unwilling
          to make concessions, and keeping one’s own situation under wraps. The authors of a book called
          “Getting to Yes” argue a third option, which is a balanced approach.
          In the book, authors Roger Fisher and William Ury advocate principled negotiation, which has
          four components:
          1.   Insist on using objective criteria: As a preventative method of keeping emotions at bay,
               try whenever possible to use objective criteria. Beforehand, make sure the parties agree
               on what is “objective,” be it legal precedent or scientific studies.
          2.   Separate the people from the problem: Try to account for others’ emotions and cool your
               own. Communicate  honestly and show that  you actively  and attentively  listen to the
               other side.

          3.   Invent options for mutual gain: This part involves  using the  integrative approach  of
               enlarging the pie we discussed on the previous page. Inventing new ideas could necessitate
               brainstorming and thinking of as many options as possible — both ones you can offer the
               other side or the other side can offer you. Afterward, decide which ideas sound best to
               bring to the negotiating table.
          4.   Focus on  interests, not positions:  Although  the outright  demands (positions) of either
               side might prove incompatible at first, getting to the root of the demands (the underlying
               interests that motivated them) allows the parties to rethink and adjust demands to make
               them  compatible.

          For people who just don’t feel comfortable with negotiation, the principled negotiation approach
          serves as a great alternative to the difficult choice between being conciliatory or aggressive. By
          minimizing emotions and focusing on objective sense of fairness, people gain more confidence
          without feeling that they’re making enemies or being victimized.
          But some negotiation theorists say it isn’t quite that simple. The question of strategy typically
          revolves around predicting the other side’s moves. Because we predict you will go to the next
          page, we’ll explain this concept there.






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   167
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177