Page 227 - DCOM102_DMGT101_PRINCIPLES_AND_PRACTICES_OF_MANAGEMENT
P. 227

Unit 12: Organisational Change




               unacceptable and that change is worth the effort.  In essence, individuals surrender by  Notes
               allowing the boundaries of their status quo to be opened in preparation for change.
          2.   Change or moving: If unfreezing succeeds, people want to make a change, but they still
               need to see a path to a better state. In the moving stage, new attitudes, values and behaviours
               are substituted for old ones. Organisations accomplish moving by initiating new options
               and explaining the rationale for the change, as  well as  by providing  training to  help
               employees develop the new skills needed.
               The transformation stage requires altering one or more characteristics of the work setting:
               (a)  The structure and systems of the organisation;
               (b)  Social factors – characteristics of employees, the way they interact, the organisational
                    culture;
               (c)  The organisation's technology and/or
               (d)  The physical setting.
               The implication is that changes in the work setting will lead to changes in  individual
               behaviour, which in turn will improve the organisation's outcomes.
          3.   Refreezing: For the change to endure, it must be reinforced as part of a new system. Lewin
               calls this step 'refreezing'. Refreezing is the final step in the change process. In this step,
               new attitudes, values and behaviours are established as the new status quo. In some cases,
               the people affected by the change will clearly benefit from it. The resulting benefits will
               themselves reinforce the change. In other cases, the manager needs to take an active role
               in reinforcing the change. The new ways of operating should be cemented and reinforced.
               Managers  should  ensure  that  the  organisational  culture  and  formal  reward  system
               encourage the new behaviours and avoid rewarding the old ways of operating.

          Force Field Analysis

          A useful technique for analyzing change situations is Kurt Lewin's force-field analysis method.
          This technique describes and analyses the various forces that operate in social systems to keep
          the system either in balance or in state of change. Lewin's method proposes that two sets of
          forces operate in any system: forces that operate for change (the driving forces) and forces that
          operate against change (the resisting forces). If the two sets of forces are equal in strength, then
          the system is in equilibrium. This is explained through the Figure 12.2 which shows a force field
          analysis of a decision to engage in exercise behaviour.
                              Figure  12.2: Force-field  Analysis of  Equilibrium



                   FORCES FOR CHANGE                          FORCES FOR

                                                              STATUS QUO
                   Weight gain                                Lack of time


                   Minimally passing treadmill                No exercise facility
                   test                                       at  work

                   Feel lethargic; having no   Equilibrium    Spouse/partner hates
                   energy                                     to exercise

                   Family history of                          No interest in physical
                   cardiovascular disease                     activity or sports
                   New Physically                             Made a grade of D in
                   demanding job                              physical education class
          Source: Debra L Nelson and James Campbell Quick "Organisation  Behaviour – Foundations,  Realities  and
          Challenges"  (Second Edition) West Publishing  Company, Minneapolis (1997) Page 552.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   219
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232