Page 152 - DSOC202_SOCIAL_STRATIFICATION_ENGLISH
P. 152

Unit 8: Race and Ethnicity


            In 1982 anthropologist David Craig Griffith summed up forty years of ethnographic research,  Notes
            arguing that racial and ethnic categories are symbolic markers for different ways that people from
            different parts of the world have been incorporated into a global economy :
                The opposing interests that divide the working classes are further reinforced through
                appeals to “racial” and “ethnic” distinctions. Such appeals serve to allocate different
                categories of workers to rungs on the scale of labor markets, relegating stigmatized
                populations to the lower levels and insulating the higher echelons from competition
                from below. Capitalism did not create all the distinctions of ethnicity and race that
                function to set off categories of workers from one another. It is, nevertheless, the
                process of labor mobilization under capitalism that imparts to these distinctions their
                effective values.
            According to Wolf, races were constructed and incorporated during the period of European
            mercantile expansion, and ethnic groups during the period of capitalist expansion.
            Often, ethnicity also connotes shared cultural, linguistic, behavioural or religious traits. For example,
            to call oneself Jewish or Arab is to immediately invoke a clutch of linguistic, religious, cultural and
            racial features that are held to be common within each ethnic category. Such broad ethnic categories
            have also been termed macroethnicity. This distinguishes them from smaller, more subjective ethnic
            features, often termed microethnicity.
            In some cases, especially involving transnational migration, or colonial expansion, ethnicity is
            linked to nationality. Anthropologists and historians, following the modernist understanding of
            ethnicity as proposed by Ernest Gellner and Benedict Anderson see nations and nationalism as
            developing with the rise of the modern state system in the seventeenth century. They culminated
            in the rise of “nation-states” in which the presumptive boundaries of the nation coincided (or
            ideally coincided) with state boundaries. Thus, in the West, the notion of ethnicity, like race and
            nation, developed in the context of European colonial expansion, when mercantilism and capitalism
            were promoting global movements of populations at the same time that state boundaries were
            being more clearly and rigidly defined. In the nineteenth century, modern states generally sought
            legitimacy through their claim to represent “nations.”
            Nation-states, however, invariably include populations that have been excluded from national life
            for one reason or another. Members of excluded groups, consequently, will either demand inclusion
            on the basis of equality, or seek autonomy, sometimes even to the extent of complete political
            separation in their own nation-state. Under these conditions—when people moved from one state
            to another, or one state conquered or colonized peoples beyond its national boundaries—ethnic
            groups were formed by people who identified with one nation, but lived in another state.

            8.1 Race

            Most modern societies have numerous ethnic and racial groups. India, the USA, the UK, Canada,
            etc., are plural societies. Economically and politically, ethnic and racial groups may perform the
            same functions in a particular society, though culturally they are generally distinct from each
            other. However, in reality, ethnic and racial differences are also marked by inequalities of power
            and wealth, tension and conflict, and prejudice and discrimination. There are also ethnic and
            racial minorities, and as such they are bound to have unequal access to opportunities and status
            distinctions. Discrimination based on ethnic and racial considerations has been reported from
            both highly industrialized and less industrialized societies. But ethnic or racial minorities are not
            necessarily backward economically and socially. In India, some ethnic groups are minorities, but
            economically they are far more ahead of the majority groups. Parsis, Christians, Sikhs are generally
            better off than other groups in their respective regions.





                                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    147
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157