Page 41 - DECO402_Macro Economics
P. 41

Macroeconomic Theory




                     Notes            Using such a evaluation method, Nordhaus and Tobin is United States of America in 1965 estimated
                                      MEW that was 1200 Billion dollar which was double to GNP of that year. In the period of 1929-65 the
                                      estimation of per person MEW was 1.1 Percent annually, whereas precipitate GNP estimated was
                                      1.7 Percent. There estimation expresses clearly the during this period in America economic welfare
                                      increase magnificently.
                                      But form above discussion it should not be concluded that the concept of MEW does not substitute.
                                      It is most supplementary of GNP which economic welfare including with GNP non- market activities
                                      are included.


                                      Self Assessment
                                      State whether the following statements are true or False:
                                        7.   The changing in the distribution of national income by two types.
                                        8.   Rest is an important factor affection society’s welfare.
                                        9.   In the estimation of GNP, the quality of life is not included.
                                       10.   Externalities have tendency to minimize or maximize welfare also.

                                      3.4   Summary

                                      Economic welfare and national income both are measured is money, due to this reason pigor has
                                      established close connection between these. When national income increase then economic welfare
                                      increases and vice- versa. The effect of national income on economic welfare can be studied by two
                                      methods: first, changing in the size of national income, secondly chancing in the distribution of
                                      national income.

                                      3.5   Keywords

                                           y  Regressive – coming below
                                           y  Leisure Empty time, rest


                                      3.6   Review Questions
                                        1.   The size of national income and distribution system, how effects system of economic welfare,
                                           explained. Give example.
                                        2.   Discuss the effects on welfare of changing in size and distribution of National Dividend.
                                        3.   Evaluate the views of economic welfare. Clearly it's relations with only counties national
                                           income.
                                        4.   In the interest of poor, changing in the distribution of national dividend, whatever their effects
                                           on economic welfare, explained it clearly.


                                      Answers: Self Assessment

                                         1. satisfaction    2. happy                 3. total summation
                                         4. (a)             5. (b)                   6. (a)
                                         7. True            8. True                  9. True
                                         10. True





               34                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46