Page 78 - DECO402_Macro Economics
P. 78

Unit-8: Relative Income Hypothesis




                       APC reduce of every persons related with poor and rich family. So, when income increase,   Notes
                       then consumption function will not shift up from C  to C
                                                                S1   S2
                   4.   Reversible consumer Behaviour: According to Michal Ivenj, “Consumer behavior is slowly-
                       slowly change not fully unchanged. Then as more time expend from last maximum level,
                       current consumption of last maximum income status will as low effected.” If we know it also
                       that how any consumer had to spend on last maximum income status, then it is not possible
                       to know that now how he will spend.
                   5.   Neglect of other Factors: Present principle is bases on assumption that the change in
                       expenditure of consumer is related with his last high income level. This principle is weak
                       according that it neglects the other component that affects the consumer-behaviour like
                       updating new consumer things, changes in age-structure, urbanizations and asset holder.






                    Task      Express his idea on Relative income Hypothesis.

                   6.   Consumer Preferences do not Depend on other: The unreal assumption of that principle
                       is that consumer preferences is dependent on each other according to it the expenditure
                       of any consumer is related with the consumption
                       structure of his rich neighbour. But it is not always.
                       By the direct study of Prof. George Katona get that
                       expectancy and nature are important in consumer
                       expenditure. He says that the nature of income
                       –expectancy and asset perception based on the
                       status of ambition is more affected to consumer
                       expenditure  relation  in  comparison  to  display
                       effect.
                   7.   Reverse Lighting Bolt Effect: Prof. Smith and Pro
                       Jackson criticizes the Dussenberry on the bases of
                       their experience prove that the income is recovering
                       after depression it is no because of Ratchet effect but   Fig. 8.2
                       the consumption experience of consumer is just like ‘reverse lightning bolt effect’. It is because
                       that consumer increases his consumption on increasing income slowly-slowly because of
                       ‘irregular habit stability’ after depression. It is show in figure 8.2 where consumption status
                       shows with increasing income by arrow as the reverse lightning bolt.


                Self Assessment
                State whether the following statements are True or False:
                   7.   Though the principle of Dussenberry solves the direct opposition among short period and
                       long period study.
                   8.   The relative income assumption is that income and consumption are rationally increased.
                   9.   Consumption and income are directly related.
                   10.   There is always rational increment in consumption from the increment in income on full
                       employment status.








                                       LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                               71
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83