Page 372 - DECO503_INTERNATIONAL_TRADE_AND_FINANCE_ENGLISH
P. 372

International Trade and Finance



                  Notes          more attention toward improving the quality of rice and wheat procured so that it can fetch a good
                                 price in the international market.
                                 EXIM Policy has laid great emphasis on Special Economic Zones (SEZs) which is a new incarnation
                                 of the Export Promotion Zones (EPZ) and Export-oriented Units (EOUs) promoted earlier. But the
                                 experience of the EPZ and EOUs has not been very happy. Together they account for only 12% of
                                 total exports. Too many procedural hurdles have prevented them from performing better. It would
                                 be very wise if the Special Economic Zones are not saddled with such excessive bureaucratic hurdles
                                 and are enabled to capture export markets. It may be noted the Special Economic Zones in China
                                 account for over 40 per cent of Chinese exports. India should learn to improve the performance of
                                 SEZs.
                                 EXIM Policy made some concessions to help cottage and handicraft sector and small scale units
                                 which account for nearly 35 percent of the country’s exports. But ironically, the policy did not pay
                                 adequate attention to the most important aspect of increasing bank credit to this sector.
                                                Table 1 : Exports and Imports of Gems and Jewellery : India
                                                                                                     (US $ million)

                                                 Gross Exports      Imports       Net Exports     3 as % of 1
                                                      (1)             (2)           3 = 1-2

                                      1995-96        5,275           2106            3169            60.1
                                      1999-00        7,550           5346            2114            28.0
                                      2000-01        7384            4838            2546            34.9
                                      2001-02        7306            4623            2683            36.7
                                      2002-03        9030            6063            2967            32.9
                                      2003-04        10,573          7129            3444            32.6
                                      2004-05        13,761          9422            4339            31.5
                                      2005-06        15529           9134            6395            41.2
                                      2006-07        15977           7487            8490            53.1
                                      2007-08        19657           7975            11682           59.4
                                      2008-09        27,955          16,554         11,401           40.8
                                      2009-10        29,000          16,164         13,836           47.7
                                      2010-11        40,791          31,262          9,529           23.4
                                      Source : Computed from the data provided in Economic survey (2003-04) and (2005-06), RBI,
                                             Handbook of Statistics on the Indian Economy 2009-10. Economic Survey 2009-10.
                                 The policy allowed import of rough diamond duty free. But if we examine the proportion of net
                                 exports of diamonds in total exports of gems and jewellery, it becomes evident that this share has
                                 declined from 60.1 percent in 1995-96 and 28 percent 1999-2000, but later on it improved again to
                                 59.4 percent in 2007-08. In 2009-10 it was 47.7 per cent, which again fell to 23.4 percent is 2010-11. We
                                 note a decline in this proportion of net export of gem and jewellary which may be attributed to global
                                 slowdown. This underlines the fact that mere reduction of import-duty does not provide the much
                                 needed elasticity to exports.
                                 To sum up, it may be mentioned that Commerce and Industry Ministry alone cannot create an
                                 environment to boost exports. For this purpose, it has to co-ordinate with the Ministry of Power and
                                 Transport so that the delays in handling of goods for export can be taken care of. Similarly, the Commerce
                                 Ministry has to pursuade the Ministry of Finance to allocate more resources for infrastructure
                                 development. Not only that, the Centre and State Governments must co-ordinate to fulfil the objective
                                 of increasing exports. This can be done by making our exports more competitive. This requires an
                                 improvement of technology in the export sector and the development of an efficient infrastructure.



        366                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377