Page 83 - DECO503_INTERNATIONAL_TRADE_AND_FINANCE_ENGLISH
P. 83

Unit 7 : Causes of Emergence and Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade and Its Impact on Developing Economics



        Many empirical studies have been done to analyse  the empirical links between the structure of  Notes
        industrial exports and the level of income per capita. Hufbauer tested the relationship between income
        per capita and the composition of trade. The story of Linder is a controversial alternative to factor
        proportions theory.  As regards the bilateral trade intensity,  Linnemann has made explicit reference
        to distance variable which is absent in Linder. Johnson   suggested  that the positive relationship
        between trade intensity and "Linder variable" (international similarity in per capita GNP) could be
        the result of the reality of geographical proximity among countries with similar wealth levels.  Thus,
        Linder variable is a surrogate for distance and distance between partners is deterrent to trade.
        Following   Bergstrand (1985) &   Linneman  (1986), Hanink has developed a gravity model   [Bergstrand
        (1985)]  and analyzed Linder's theme as a  "spatial interaction model"  i.e., model based on mutual
        attraction between places.
        So far as the empirical testing of Linder corollary relating to the commodity composition of trade in
        manufactured goods is concerned, the statements is "Potential exports and imports are--when they
        are manufactured--the same products. An actual import product today is a potential export product
        today and may be an actual export product tomorrow."  This means that there would be a similarity
        between a country's export vector of manufactures and its import vector of manufactures--irrespective
        of its level of development. This export-import similarity is measured by either, Finger and Kreinin
        (1979) Export-Import Similarity (EIS) index or, by Allen's Cosine measure (COS).





                 In Linder's version, exports of manufactures are an outgrowth of a home production
                 satisfying the home consumption demand

        A study by  Linnemann  and Beers (1988) on the commodity composition of exports of a country and
        of imports of another country shows that Linder thesis of a potentially relatively stronger trade in
        manufactures between countries of similar level of per capita income is rejected. On the other hand,
        the potential intensity of trade would generally seem to increase with increasing per capita income of
        the trading partners. Gray notes the applicability of Linder's proposition to the explanation of IIT and
        relates it to the theory of differentiated markets in international trade. Gray  calls these goods as 'Linder
        Goods' and these goods are the primary component of the large volume of trade between countries.
        Overlapping demands also arise in the context of product variety i.e., the number of goods in a
        country's basket of imports/exports. Overlapping demands among rich countries can cover both
        income elastic and income inelastic goods.
        Increasing Returns and Scale Economies
        Increasing returns to scale provide an additional factor motivating trade where both countries benefit
        from trade even when they are identical with respect to tastes and technology. This is supply side
        explanation of models. Such trade cannot be carried on in conditions of perfect competition and
        equilibrium will require that the firms involved have some degree of market power. The role of scale
        economies is of particular interest because of their importance to theoretical models. Most genuine
        IIT consists of two way trade in differentiated products, since with the exception of strategic trade in
        oligopoly market situations, homogenous goods IIT is believed to represent border or seasonal trade.
        The first departure from the standard competitive model is the Marshallian approach in which
        increasing returns are assumed to be external to the firm and internal to the industry, allowing perfect
        competition to remain. According to Krugman, the literature did not seem to offer the interaction of
        increasing returns and comparative advantage as explanations of trade. Ethier  cast his approach to
        the problem in terms of the two-way trade in intermediate goods, providing a formal basis for relating
        IIT to external economies linked to the world market size. Subsequently in Ethier, he produced a
        model in which external and internal economies of scale interact to generate IIT starting from the
        allocation of resources to production and trade. According to a simplistic version of the scale economy
        thesis, the large nation because of an assured home market will specialize in goods produced with



                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        77
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88