Page 333 - DENG501_LITERARY_CRITICISM_AND_THEORIES
P. 333

Gowher Ahmad Naik, LPU      Unit 30: Umberto Eco's 'Casablanca: Cult Movies and Intertextual Collage’ (Textual Analysis)


                 Unit 30: Umberto Eco's 'Casablanca: Cult Movies and                               Notes
                        Intertextual Collage’ (Textual Analysis)




            CONTENTS
            Objectives

            Introduction
            30.1 Intertextual Analysis
            30.2 Text—Casablanca
            30.3 Summary
            30.4 Key-Words
            30.5 Review Questions
            30.6 Further Readings


          Objectives

          After reading this Unit students will be able to:
          •   Discuss Eco’s Casablanca.
          •   Analyse Eco’s Casablanca.

          Introduction

          All texts, whether they are spoken or written, make their meanings against the background of
          other texts and things that have been said on other occasions (Lemke 1992). Texts may more or less
          implicitly or explicitly cite other texts, they may refer to other texts,or they may allude to other
          past, or future, texts. We thus ‘make sense of every word, every utterance, or act against the
          background of (some) other words, utterances, acts of a similar kind’ (Lemke 1995: 23). All texts
          are, thus, in an intertextual relationship with other texts.
          Umberto Eco (1987) provides an interesting discussion of inter-textuality in his chapter ‘Casablanca:
          Cult movies and intertextual collage’. Eco points out that the film Casablanca was made on a very
          small budget and in a very short time. As a result its creators were forced to improvise the plot,
          mixing a little of everything they knew worked in a movie as they went. The result is what Eco
          describes as an ‘intertextual collage’. For Eco, Casablanca has been so successful because it is not,
          in fact, an instance of a single kind of film genre but a mixing of stereotyped situations that are
          drawn from a number of different kinds of film genres. As the film proceeds, he argues, we
          recognize the film genres that they recall. We also recognize the pleasures we have experienced
          when we have watched these kinds of films.
          The first few scenes of Casablanca, for example, recall film genres such as the adventure movie,
          the patriotic movie, news reels, war propaganda movies, gangster movies, action movies, spy
          movies and finally, with the appearance of Ingrid Bergman, a romance. The poster for thismovie
          suggests a number of these film genres, but people who have seen the movie would most likely
          describe it as a romance. As Brown (1992: 7) observes, the chemistry between its two stars Humphrey
          Bogard and Ingrid Bergman ‘was so thick it would make movie history’ and defines Casablanca
          movie romance for all time. It is not, however, just a romance. It is, rather, a mixing of types of
          film, in which one of the major themes is the relationship between the two lead players, set in a
          world of action, adventure, spies, gangsters and of course, romance.



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       327
   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338