Page 104 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 104

Linguistics



                  Notes
                                                       θ        thin, author  x     this, father
                                                       f        sheep        ¥      vision
                                                       (×       loch)        j      yes
                                 4.   Stress
                                      Likewise, there is no disagreement among IPA users about the symbols for word stress (although
                                      there may well be disagreement about the analysis of secondary stress). Primary stress is shown
                                      by the mark’, placed before the syllable concerned. (Compare the older, non-lPA, dictionary
                                      tradition, where it was shown by the mark ‘ after the syllable.)
                                      Secondary stress, if shown at all, is indicated by a similar mark below the line.
                                 5.   Vowels: quantitative and qualitative
                                      The pronunciation scheme used in the first twelve editions of EPD was one that required rather
                                      few special symbols. It achieved this parsimony by transcribing the English vowels
                                      quantitatively. This meant writing /i:/ for the vowel of reed and /i/ for that of rid, using the
                                      same phonetic symbol with and without a length mark.
                                                           i +   reed
                                                           i     rid
                                                           ]+    cord
                                                           ]     cod
                                      The vowel of cord was written / ] :/, that of cod / ] /, and similarly for other pairs. Thus the
                                      difference in vowel quality (vowel timbre, vowel colour) between such pairs of vowels was not
                                      shown explicitly but had to be inferred from the presence or absence of the length mark.
                                                          i      reed
                                                          I or ~  rid
                                                           ]     cord
                                                          Z      cod
                                      Many phoneticians were dissatisfied with this scheme, feeling that the difference in vowel
                                      quality was at least as important as that of quantity. They preferred to use a scheme in which
                                      each vowel was shown by a separate letter-shape, without the use of length marks. Thus /i/
                                      was used for reed, /w/ for rid, / ] / for cord and /Z/ for cod. This qualitative scheme was
                                      particularly popular among speech therapists and students of speech and drama.
                                                           i +  reed
                                                           w    rid
                                                           ]+   cord
                                                           Z    cod
                                      The rivalry of these two widely used schemes was resolved by A.C. Gimson. Both in his own
                                      works and in Jones’s EPD, which he took over as editor, he made use of a scheme that was both
                                      quantitative and quantitative. It uses distinct letter-shapes for the different vowels, but also
                                      retains length marks for the long vowels. So reed is written with /i:/, rid with /w/, cord with /
                                      ] :/, and cod with /Z/. The resulting scheme is admittedly somewhat redundant — but almost
                                      all British phoneticians quickly rallied to it, and this quantitative-qualitative notation has become
                                      a de facto standard.
                                      All three types of transcription can be defended as conforming to IPA principles. All are equally
                                      “scientific”. All convey the same information, equally unambiguously. The difference is in what
                                      they make explicit and what they leave to be inferred. The quantitative-qualitative type, now
                                      generally adopted, makes explicit both vowel length and vowel quality.
                                 6.   Vowels: the standard scheme
                                      By 1990 the quantitative-qualitative transcription had been adopted by all the most influential
                                      writers on phonetics in England, and by many general dictionaries. It is found, for example, in


        98                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109