Page 238 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 238

Linguistics



                  Notes             Though this is not impossible to pronounce, something like  sks rθw  c  É n  or swksrc•n is a more
                                    likely pronunciation for the last two words. In clusters of three plosives or two plosives plus a
                                    fricative, the middle plosive may disappear, so that the following pronunciations result:
                                    ‘acts’  F ks , ‘looked back’ l• k  bk , ‘scripts’ skrwps
                                                              F
                                 4. Loss of final v in ‘of before consonants; for example:
                                    ‘lots of them’ lZts c xcm, ‘waste of money’ wewst c m• ni
                                 This last example is typical of very casual speech, and would be regarded as substandard by
                                 conservative listeners. A more common case is where the vowel of ‘of is lost, leaving either v in a
                                 voiced context (e.g. ‘all of mine’  ]+l v mawn) or f in a voiceless context (e.g. ‘best of three’ best f θ ri+).
                                 It is difficult to know whether contractions of grammatical words should be regarded as examples of
                                 elision or not. The fact that they are regularly represented with special spelling forms makes them
                                 seem rather different from the above examples. The best-known cases are:
                                 •    ‘had’, ‘would’: spelt’d, pronounced d (after vowels), cd (after consonants);
                                 •    ‘is’, ‘has’: spelt’s, pronounced s (after fortis consonants), z (after lenis consonants), except that
                                      after s, z, ∫ , ¥, t ∫ , d¥ ‘is’ is pronounced wz and ‘has’ is pronounced cz in contracted form;

                                 •    ‘will’: spelt ’ll, pronounced l (after vowels),  l  (after consonants);
                                                                         '
                                 •    ‘have’: spelt’ve, pronounced v (after vowels), cv (after consonants);
                                 •    ‘not’: spelt n’t, pronounced nt (after vowels),  n t (after consonants). There are also vowel changes
                                                                         ,
                                      associated with n’t (e.g. ‘can’  knF  - ‘can’t’ kY+nt; ‘do’ du+ -’don’t’ dc•nt; ‘shall’  ∫ F l - ‘shan’t’

                                      ∫ Y+nt);
                                 •    ‘are’: spelt ‘re, pronounced c after vowels, usually with some change in the preceding vowel
                                      (e.g. ‘you’ ju+ - ‘you’re’ j•c or j]+, ‘we’ wi+ - ‘we’re’ wic, ‘they’ xew - ‘they’re’ xec); linking is
                                      used when a vowel follows, as explained in the next section. Contracted ‘are’ is also pronounced
                                      as c or cr when following a consonant.
                                 17.5 Linking


                                 In our hypothetical “mechanical speech” all words would be separate units placed next to each other
                                 in sequence; in real connected speech, however, we link words together in a number of ways. The
                                 most familiar case is the use of linking r; the phoneme r does not occur in syllable-final position in
                                 the BBC accent, but when the spelling of a word suggests a final r, and a word beginning with a
                                 vowel follows, the usual pronunciation is to pronounce with r. For example:
                                 ‘here’ hwc but  ‘here are’ hwcr c
                                 ‘four’ f]+ but ‘four eggs’ f]+r egz
                                 BBC speakers often use r in a similar way to link words ending with a vowel, even when there is no
                                 “justification” from the spelling, as in:
                                 ‘Formula A’ f]+mjclcr ew
                                 ‘Australia all out’ Zstrewlicr ]+l a• t
                                 ‘media event’ miwdicr wvent
                                 This has been called intrusive r; some English speakers and teachers still regard this as incorrect or
                                 substandard pronunciation, but it is undoubtedly widespread.
                                 “Linking r” and “intrusive r” are special cases of juncture; we need to consider the relationship
                                 between one sound and the sounds that immediately precede and follow it. If we take the two words
                                 ‘my turn’ maw tf+n, we know that the sounds m and aw, t and f+, and f+, and n are closely linked. The
                                 problem lies in deciding what the relationship is between ai and t; since we do not usually pause
                                 between words, there is no silence to indicate word division and to justify the space left in the



        232                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243