Page 241 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 241

Unit 17: Connected English Speech: Accent



        differences. This probably reflects the fact that the vowel systems of all English varieties are relatively  Notes
        large, so that a considerable number of vowels occupy a rather restricted articulatory and perceptual
        space; in consequence, whenever and wherever one vowel changes, it is highly likely to start to
        encroach on the territory of some adjacent vowel. It follows that a development beginning as a fairly
        minor change in the pronunciation of a single vowel will readily have a knock-on effect on other
        vowels in the system, so that accent differences in this area rapidly snowball. In addition, as we saw
        in earlier chapters, the phonetics of vowels is a very fluid area, with each dimension of vowel
        classification forming a continuum, so that small shifts in pronunciation are extremely common, and
        variation between accents, especially when speakers of those accents are not in day-to-day
        communication with each other, develops easily.
        Systemic differences in the case of vowel phonemes can be read easily from lists of Standard Lexical
        Sets and the systems plotted from these on vowel quadrilaterals. If for the moment we stick to the
        four reference accents introduced in the last chapter, namely SSBE, GA, SSE and NZE, we can see that
        SSBE has the largest number of oppositions, with the others each lacking a certain number of these.
        Comparing GA to SSBE, we find that GA lacks /Z/, so that LOT words are produced with /Y+/, as
        are PALM words, while CLOTH has the /]+/  of THOUGHT. In this respect, SSBE is ‘old-fashioned’:
        it maintains the ancestral state shared by the two accents. However, in GA realisations of the earlier
        /Z/ have changed their quality and merged, or become identical with the realisations of either /Y+/
        or /]+/. GA also lacks the centring diphthongs of SSBE, so that NEAR, SQUARE, CURE share the
        vowels of FLEECE, FACE, GOOSE respectively, but since GA is rhotic, the former lexical sets also
        have a realisation of /r/, while the latter do not. In this case, however, the historical innovation has
        been in SSBE. At the time of the initial settlement of British immigrants in North America, most
        varieties of English were rhotic, as GA still is; but the ancestor of SSBE has subsequently become non-
        rhotic. The loss of /r/ before a consonant or a pause in SSBE has had various repercussions on the
        vowel system, most notably the development of the centring diphthongs.
        In systemic terms, NZE lacks only one of the oppositions found in SSBE, namely that between  /I/
        and / c /; in NZE, both KIT and LETTER words have schwa. There are more differences in symbols
        between the SSBE and NZE lexical; but these typically reflect realisational, and sometimes
        distributional, rather than systemic differences, as we shall see in the next two sections. That is to say,
        I have chosen to represent the vowel of NZE TRAP as / ε / and DRESS as /e/, FLEECE as /Ii/ and
        FACE as / ε w/, to highlight the typical realisational differences between the two accents. However,
        in phonemic terms, the TRAP and DRESS vowel, and the FLEECE and FACE vowel, still contrast in
        NZE just as they do in SSBE. That is, the pairs of vowel phonemes in (1) are equivalent: they are
        symbolised differently because they are very generally pronounced differently (and we could equally
        well have chosen the same phonemic symbols in each case, to emphasise this parity, at the cost of a
        slightly more abstract system for NZE; see the discussion in Section above), but the members of the
        pairs are doing the same job in the different accents.
        (1)  SSBE         NZE
             e            e              DRESS
             ae           e              TRAP
             i+           Ii             FLEECE
             eI           eI             FACE
        When we turn to SSE, however, we find a considerably reduced system relative to SSBE. As we might
        expect, given that SSE is rhotic, it lacks the centring diphthongs, so that NEAR, SQUARE, CURE
        share the vowels of FLEECE, FACE, GOOSE, though the former will have a final [‹] following the
        vowel. SSE also typically lacks the / ε +/ vowel of NURSE, with [• r] appearing here instead; so the
        NURSE and STRUT sets share the same vowel. Leaving aside vowels before /r/, however, there are
        three main oppositions in SSBE which are not part of the SSE system, as shown in (2).
        (2)  SSBE         SSE
             a            a              TRAP
             Y+           a              PALM


                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       235
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246