Page 273 - DENG504_LINGUISTICS
P. 273

Unit 19: Discourse



        sophisticated the linguistic output is to be the more thorough knowledge of grammar gains  Notes
        importance. Moreover, it is essential not only for producing discourse, but also for their perception
        and comprehension, as many texts take advantage of cohesive devices which contribute to the
        unity of texts, but might disturb their understanding by a speaker who is not aware of their
        occurrence.
        Anaphoric reference, which is frequent in many oral and written texts, deserves attention due to
        problems that it may cause to learners at various levels. It is especially important at an early stage
        of learning a foreign language when learners fail to follow overall meaning turning much attention
        to decoding information in a given clause or sentence. Discourse analysts have analyzed
        schematically occurring items of texts and how learners from different backgrounds acquire them
        and later on produce. Thus, it is said that Japanese students fail to distinguish the difference
        between he and she, while Spanish pupils have problems with using his and your. Teachers, being
        aware of possible difficulties in teaching some aspects of grammar, should pay particular attention
        to them during the introduction of the new material to prevent making mistakes and errors.
        The most prominent role in producing sophisticated discourse, and therefore one that requires
        much attention on the part of teachers and learners is that of words and phrases which signal
        internal relation of sections of discourse, namely conjunctions. McCarthy claims that there are
        more than forty conjunctive words and phrases, which might be difficult to teach. Moreover,
        when it comes to the spoken form of language, where and, but, so, then are most frequent, they
        may take more than one meaning, which is particularly true for and. Additionally, they not only
        contribute to the cohesion of the text, but are also used when a participant of a conversation takes
        his turn to speak to link his utterance to what has been said before.
        The foregoing notions that words crucial for proper understanding of discourse, apart from their
        lexical meaning, are also significant for producing natural discourse in many situations support
        the belief that they should be pondered on by both teachers and students. Furthermore, it is
        advisable to provide learners with contexts which would exemplify how native users of language
        take advantage of anaphoric references, ellipses, articles and other grammar related elements of
        language which, if not crucial, are at least particularly useful for proficient communication.
        Application of Discourse Analysis to Teaching Vocabulary
        What is probably most striking to learners of a foreign language is the quantity of vocabulary used
        daily and the amount of time that they will have to spend memorizing lexical items. Lexis may
        frequently cause major problems to students, because unlike grammar it is an open-ended system
        to which new items are continuously added. That is why it requires close attention and, frequently,
        explanation on the part of the teacher, as well as patience on the part of the student.
        Scholars have conducted in-depth research into techniques employed by foreign language learners
        concerning vocabulary memorization to make it easier for students to improve their management
        of lexis. The conclusion was drawn that it is most profitable to teach new terminology paying close
        attention to context and co-text that new vocabulary appears in which is especially helpful in
        teaching and learning aspects such as formality and register. Discourse analysts describe co-text
        as the phrases that surround a given word, whereas, context is understood as the place in which
        the communicative product was formed.
        From studies conducted by discourse analysts emerged an important idea of lexical chains present
        in all consistent texts. Such a chain is thought to be a series of related words which, referring to the
        same thing, contribute to the unity of a communicative product and make its perception relatively
        easy. Additionally, they provide a semantic context which is useful for understanding, or inferring
        the meaning of words, notions and sentences. Links of a chain are not usually limited to one
        sentence, as they may connect pairs of words that are next to one another, as well as stretch to
        several sentences or a whole text. The relation of words in a given sequence might be that of
        reiteration or collocation, however, analyst are reluctant to denote collocation as a fully reliable
        element of lexical cohesion as it refers only to the likelihood of occurrence of some lexical items.
        Nevertheless, it is undeniably helpful to know collocations as they might assist in understanding
        of communicative products and producing native-like discourse.


                                         LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       267
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278