Page 265 - DMTH404_STATISTICS
P. 265
Unit 18: The Weak Law
Notes
n
n (k n(p
e )) p q n k
k
k
k 0
k n n n q k p n k
P p e (pe ) (qe )
n k 0 k
q
= e n pe qe p n ...(18.6)
2
x
Since e x + e for any real x,
x
2 2 2 2
q
–p
pe + qe p(q + e q ) + q(–p + e p )
2 2 2 2 2
= pe q + qe p e . ...(18.7)
Substituting (18.7) into (18.6), we get
k 2 n
n
P p e .
n
But n – n is minimum for = /2 and hence
2
k n 2 /4
P p e , 0. ...(18.8)
n
Similarly
k n 2 /4
P p £ e
n
and hence we obtain Bernstein’s inequality
k 2
P p £ 2e n /4 . ...(18.9)
n
Bernstein’s inequality is more powerful than Tchebyshev’s inequalityas it states that the chances
for the relative frequency k /n exceeding its probability p tends to zero exponentially fast as
n .
Chebyshev’s inequality gives the probability of k /nto lie between and for a specific n. We can
use Bernstein’s inequality to estimate the probability for k /nto lie between and for all large n
Towards this, let
k
y p p
n
n
so that
n
c n 2 /4
P(y ) P p 2e
n
k
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY 257