Page 205 - DMTH503_TOPOLOGY
P. 205

Unit 23: The Stone–Cech Compactification




          Let ,  be respectively the families of all continuous functions from X, Y respectively to the  Notes
              1  2
                                                                        2 
                                                               1 
          unit interval [0, 1] and let e, e be the embedding of X, Y into [0,1]  and [0,1]  respectively. For
                              2 
          any g  letg :  [0,1] [0, 1] be the corresponding projection.
                  2
          Then  o e of is  a  map from X into [0, 1] and so it has  an extension say    to  (X). Then
                 g                                                        g
           o e   o e o f.
           g    g
                                                                                
          Now consider the family {  = g } of maps from (X) into [0, 1]. Let  : (X)[0, 1] be the
                                g      2
          evaluation map determined by this family. We claim that  o e = e o f. Let xX. Them (e(x)) is
                          2 
          an element of  [0,1] given by
                      (e(x))(g) = g(e(x))      [by the definition of the evaluation functions]
                     But  (e(x)) =  (e’f(x)) = e’(f(x))(g)
                         g       g
          Thus for all      g 
                                 2
                     [ e(x) (g) o  ]   = e f(x) (g)  and  so
                                  
                                é
                                      ù
                                      û
                                ë
                                  o
                           o g = e f   as claimed.
                                 o
          Now            (e(x)) = e (f(X))e(Y).
                                                                 2 
          Since Y is compact, e(Y) compact and hence a closed subset of  [0,1] .
                            )
               So       (e(X)  e(Y).
          But since  is continuous,
                        (B(X)) = (e(X)  )    (e(X)  )

          Thus we see that  maps (X) into e(Y). Since e is an embedding, there exists a map e  : e(Y)  Y
                                                                             1
          which is an inverse to e regarded as a map from Y onto e(Y). Then e o e o f = f.
                                                                  1
          Uniqueness of the extension is immediate in view of the fact that Y is a Hausdorff space and e(X)
          is dense in (X).

          23.2 Summary


              A compactification of a space X is a compact Hausdorff space Y containing X as a subspace
               such that  X  = Y.
              Two compactifications Y  and Y  of X are said to be equivalent if there is a homeomorphism
                                  1     2
               h : Y Y  such that h(x) = x for every xX.
                   1   2
              If X has a compactification Y, then X must be completely regular, being a subspace of
               completely regular space Y.

              If X is completely regular, then X has a compactification.

              The pair (e, (X)), where X is a Tychonoff space and  (X)  ( e(x)=  )  is called Stone-Cech
               compactification of X, e is a map from X into (x).
              The Stone-Cech compactification is defined for all Tychonoff spaces.






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   199
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210