Page 91 - DMTH505_MEASURE_THEOREY_AND_FUNCTIONAL_ANALYSIS
P. 91

Measure Theory and Functional Analysis




                    Notes          in the following sense: For every bounded linear functional    on L  there is a unique g   L  so
                                                                                         p
                                                                                                            q
                                   that
                                                             (f) =  f(x)g(x)d (x), for all f  L p
                                                                  x
                                   Moreover,                  =  g  q .
                                                               *   L
                                   This theorem justifies the terminology where by q is usually called the dual exponent of p.
                                   The proof of the theorem is based on two ideas. The first, as already seen, is Hölder’s inequality;
                                                                                                         p
                                   to which a converse is also needed. The second is the fact that a linear functional    on L , 1   p
                                   <  , leads naturally to a (signed) measure  . Because of the continuity of    the measure   is
                                   absolutely continuous with respect to the underlying measure  , and our desired function g is
                                   then the density function of   in terms of  .
                                   We begin with:
                                   Lemma: Suppose 1   p, q   , are conjugate exponents.


                                             q
                                   (i)  If g   L , then  g  q  sup  fg .
                                                      L
                                                          f  p
                                                           L  1
                                   (ii)  Suppose g is integrable on all sets of finite measure and
                                                        sup fg = M <
                                                        f  L p  1
                                                        f simple

                                   Then g   L , and  g  q  = M.
                                           q
                                                   L
                                   For the proof of the lemma, we recall the signum of a real number defined by

                                                                   1 if x 0
                                                         sign (x) =   1 if x 0
                                                                   0 if x 0

                                   Proof: We start with (i). If g = 0, there is nothing to prove, so we may assume that g is not 0 a.e.,
                                   and hence  g   0 . By Hölder’s inequality, we have that
                                              L q

                                                           g  q    sup  fg .
                                                             L
                                                                  f  p
                                                                   L  1
                                   To prove the reverse inequality we consider several cases.

                                      First, if q = 1 and p =  , we may take f (x) = sign g (x). Then, we have  f  1  and
                                                                                                       L
                                       clearly fg  g  1 .
                                                     L

                                                                                             q 1
                                      If  1  <  p,  q  <  ,  then  we  set  f  (x)  =  |g  (x)| q–1   sign  g(x) g  q .   We  observe  that
                                                                                             L
                                          p        p(q 1)   p(q 1)
                                         f     g(x)   d   g      1  since p (q – 1) = q, and that  fg  g  q .
                                          L p               L q                                  L





          84                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96