Page 15 - DSOC402_SOCIOLOGY_OF_KINSHIP_ENGLISH
P. 15

Unit 2: Kinship: Basic Terms and Concepts:  Lineage, Clan, Phratry, Moiety ...





                  Phratry and Moiety                                                                  Notes
                  When due to any reason many Lineages get joined as a bigger group then such group is called
                  Phratry. All the lineage of a tribe when divided into two Phratries, then the social structure so
                  form is called dual organisation and every phratries among this is called Moiety. Phratry may be
                  exogamous or may not be. Two Toda Phratries i.e. Tarathral and Teyevaliole are endogamous,
                  though these are divided in many exogamous liniages. It is said that Moiety of Nagas were en-
                  dogamous in the past but later on became exogamous. Social organisation of Bondo is divided
                  in two Moieties—Ontal and Killo. These became region exogamous and lineage exogamous by
                  coming in contact of their neighbour’s culture. Due to this endogamy also developed in their
                  Moiety.
                  One phratry has many lineages. How phratry is formed, its knowledge is important in itself. In
                  this reference Lowy has described four possibilities —
                  First, many lineage can mix together without losing their all residues of earlier separation.
                  Second, a lineage may so big or comprehensive that it may divide in many small groups. In
                  these groups the earlier precepts of unity is not get broken totally. The example of addition or
                  subtraction of lineages is seen in Uranv, Ho and Munda tribes of common origin.
                  Third, is the interesting possibility of extinction of lineage. Reverse had given such information
                  about extinction in Toda tribes. According to him, earlier lineages were popular in Todas but
                  later on they all got extinct and only two remained safe on which its dual organisation is based.
                  In this process, a lineage grown so much that its member started taking their spouse from all
                  other lineages. As a result, it became difficult to marry between other lineages and stages ar-
                  rived that they all mixed and became a lineage. The dual organisation popular among Gond’s
                  may also developed in this way.
                  Fourth, Lowy had told that the origin of lineage and Moiety may be by separate ways and due to
                  separate reasons. Further, they can mix together and form a big organisation of social arrange-
                  ment. The base of this possibility of Lowy is American Dutt.

                  Paternity and Maternity

                  Morgan and his followers had tried to find in their studies the origin and preliminary types
                  of social institutions. Their belief was that the social evolution is a fixed law and truly applies
                  on all social institutions. In this way Morgan tells that the ancient form of kinship group was
                  lineage or flock and the development of family occurred comparatively afterwards. Carrying
                  this further Morgan believed that in view of evolution, maternal lineage was of earlier period
                  in comparison to paternal lineage and therefore it is the most ancient kinship group of human
                  society. For description of the origin of family, Morgan had established some reasons which are
                  hypothetical random.
                  It is a belief of Morgan that free sex is the first stage of the sexual relation of early humans,
                  thus paternal fixation was difficult. As a result, inheritance was decided in form of matriarchy.
                  In course of time, free sex was replaced with controlled sexual relations and even collection of
                  property also started. In this situation, fathers may have opposed the entity of mothers in which
                  they were deprived of their rights of paternity as well as their descents from the succession of
                  their property. According to Morgan, due to this revolt of fathers, paternal sibs were estab-
                  lished. In the situation of free sex, reproduction among blood relatives may be popular gener-
                  ally. It is a belief of Morgan that the health of related persons may has affected adversely by such
                  endo reproduction. Therefore the exogamous sib may be a result of reformative act. Thus, no
                  medical or historical evidence is available to prove true or false to the hypothetical side effects
                  of reproduction. The argument of Morgan can also be not accepted that under sib exogamy even
                  the marriage is prohibited among the biotically unrelated people but it is permitted among the
                  people related with blood.



                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        9
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20