Page 171 - DCOM103_COMMERCIAL_LAW
P. 171

Commercial Law




                    Notes



                                     Case Study
                                           overnmental responsibility for food in Canada is divided among the federal, 10
                                           provincial, three territorial, and thousands of municipal governments. Some 77
                                     Gpieces of legislation govern food inspection among three levels of government.
                                     Federal responsibility centres on export and inter-provincial trade: protecting and
                                     expanding export markets for Canadian food products, and facilitating interprovincial
                                     trade. In addition, the federal government sets food safety, quality and grading standards
                                     for products sold inter-provincially and internationally and administers regulations aimed
                                     at preventing the production or sale in Canada of dangerous, adulterated or misbranded
                                     products.
                                     Provinces and municipalities are responsible for:
                                     The intraprovincial aspects of the food industry, including local food processing, the food
                                     service industry, and the food retail industry.
                                     They decide whether and how to inspect local operations, including restaurants and
                                     grocery stores, as well as dairies and meat plants whose products are sold within the
                                     province. (Moore and Skogstad, p. 130) The federal government of Canada faced a number
                                     of food security problems in the early 1990s, which facilitated adoption of innovative
                                     reform measures:
                                     1.   Canada’s reputation for high quality food had been damaged by the “tainted tuna”
                                          scandal.

                                     2.   Resources for additional inspection of fish products were not available; resources

                                          were not only scarce but shrinking.
                                     3.   The Government wanted to reform its public service along the lines achieved in the
                                          United Kingdom and New Zealand, where separate agencies were spun off from
                                          government.
                                     4.   Developments in international trade and potential developments in interprovincial
                                          trade:
                                          (a)   Industry and governments favoured harmonized standards and streamlined
                                               inspection to ensure the competitiveness of the Canadian food industry
                                               domestically & internationally.
                                          (b)   Canadian producers/processors were vulnerable to trade challenges in a
                                               fragmented system.
                                          (c)   Gaps resulting from non-inspection or non-rigorous inspection were perceived
                                               by processors as a weak link, despite the small percentage of overall production
                                               represented and assurances outlined in the Auditor General of Canada’s 1994
                                               Report.

                                          (d)   Closer integration of the US and Canadian markets under free trade agreements
                                               made the industry anxious to reduce the costs and inefficiencies resulting from

                                               differing provincial standards e.g. fl uid milk.
                                     5.   The “national treatment” principle in the North American Free Trade Agreement
                                          could be interpreted to mean that imports must meet the provincial standard of
                                          the province they enter rather than the standard required for inter-provincial or
                                                                                                        Contd...




          164                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176