Page 169 - DMGT405_FINANCIAL%20MANAGEMENT
P. 169

Unit 9: Capital Budgeting




            Advantages                                                                            Notes
            1.   It possesses the advantages, which are offered by the NPV criterion such as it considers
                 time value of money and takes into account the total cash inflows and outflows.

            2.   IRR is easier to understand. Business executives and non-technical people understand the
                 concept of IRR much more readily that they understand the concepts of NPV.

            3.   It does not use the concept of the required cost of return (or the cost of capital). It itself
                 provides a rate of return which is indicative of the profitability of the proposal. The cost of
                 capital enters the calculation, later on.
            4.   It is consistent with the overall objective of maximizing shareholders wealth since the
                 acceptance or otherwise of a project is based on comparison of the IRR with the required
                 rate of return.

            Limitations
            1.   It involves tedious calculations.
            2.   It produces multiple rates, which can be confusing.

            3.   In evaluating mutually exclusive proposals, the project with  the highest IRR would be
                 picked up to the exclusion of all others. However, in practice, it may not turn out to be one
                 that is the most profitable and consistent with the objectives of the firm i.e., maximization
                 of the wealth of the shareholders.
            4.   Under IRR method, it is assumed that, all intermediate cash flows are reinvested at the IRR
                 rate. It is not logical to think that the same firm has the ability to re-invest, the cash flows
                 at different rates. In order to have correct and reliable results it is obvious, therefore, that
                 they should be based on realistic estimates of the interest rate at which the income will be
                 re-invested.

            5.   The IRR rule requires comparing the projects IRR with the opportunity cost of capital. But,
                 sometimes, there is an opportunity cost of capital for 1 year cash flows, a different cost of
                 capital for 2-year cash flows and so on. In these cases, there is no simple yardstick for
                 evaluating the IRR of a project.

            Self Assessment

            Fill in the blanks:
            5.   Under Net Present Value (NPV) method, all cash inflows and outflow are discounted at a
                 ……………..acceptable rate of return, usually the firm’s cost of capital.
            6.   …………………is the ratio of the present value of cash inflows to the present value of the
                 cash outflows.
            7.   …………………..is the interest rate that discounts an investment’s future cash flows to the
                 present so that the present value of cash inflows exactly equals the present value of the
                 cash outflows.

            9.4 Comparison – NPV and IRR Methods


            Similarities
            In respect of conventional and independent projects, the two methods give a concurrent acceptance-
            reject  decision. In  case of conventional investment  cash outflows  are confined  to the  initial



                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  163
   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174