Page 270 - DCAP310_INTRODUCTION_TO_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AND_EXPERT_SYSTEMS
P. 270

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems




                    Notes          Self Assessment

                                   State whether the following statements are true or false:
                                   13.  If the hypothesis can be cast in a Bayesian framework, try to minimise conditional
                                       independence.

                                   14.  When forming a hypothesis, attempt to minimize the length of the description of the
                                       hypothesis.

                                   14.8 Analogical Reasoning and Learning

                                   Analogy plays an important role in learning and instruction. As John Bransford, Jeffrey Franks,
                                   Nancy Vye, and Robert Sherwood noted in 1989, analogies can help students make connections
                                   between different concepts and transfer knowledge from a well-understood domain to one that
                                   is unfamiliar or not directly perceptual.


                                          Example: The circulatory system is often explained as being like a plumbing system,
                                   with the heart as pump.
                                   Analogical reasoning involves several sub-processes: (1) retrieval of one case given another;
                                   (2) mapping between two cases in working memory; (3) evaluating the analogy and its inferences;
                                   and, sometimes, (4) abstracting the common structure. The core process in analogical reasoning
                                   is mapping. According to structure-mapping theory, developed by Dedre Gentner in 1982, an
                                   analogy is a mapping of knowledge from one domain (the base or source) into another (the
                                   target) such that a system of relations that holds among the base objects also holds among the
                                   target objects. In interpreting an analogy, people seek to put the objects of the base in one-to-one
                                   correspondence with the objects of the target so as to obtain the maximal structural match. The
                                   corresponding objects in the base and target need not resemble each other; what is important is
                                   that they hold like roles in the matching relational structures. Thus, analogy provides a way to
                                   focus on relational commonalities independently of the objects in which those relations are
                                   embedded. In explanatory analogy, a well-understood base or source situation is mapped to a
                                   target situation that is less familiar and/or less concrete. Once the two situations are aligned –
                                   that is, once the learner has established correspondences between them – then new inferences
                                   are derived by importing connected information from the base to the target. For example, in the
                                   analogy between blood circulation and plumbing, students might first align the known facts
                                   that the pump causes water to flow through the pipes with the fact that the heart causes blood to
                                   flow through the veins. Given this alignment of structure, the learner can carry over additional
                                   inferences: for example, that plaque in the veins forces the heart to work harder, just as narrow
                                   pipes require a pump to work harder.

                                   14.8.1 Makes a Good Analogy

                                   Analogy examples with corresponding meanings are the best way to show the meaning of the
                                   word “analogy.” The following is a list of some common analogies and an explanation of their
                                   meaning.
                                       The relationship between them began to thaw. This means that the relationship was
                                       changing.
                                       You are as annoying as nails on a chalkboard. You must be pretty annoying for someone
                                       to say that.

                                       I am going to be toast when I get home. This is usually said when someone is in trouble
                                       with their significant other.



          264                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275