Page 266 - DCAP310_INTRODUCTION_TO_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_AND_EXPERT_SYSTEMS
P. 266

Introduction to Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems




                    Notes          14.5 Learning by Induction

                                   Inductive learning is essentially learning by example. The process itself ideally implies some
                                   method for drawing conclusions about previously unseen examples once learning is complete.
                                   More formally, one might state: Given a set of training examples, develop a hypothesis that is as
                                   consistent as possible with the provided data. It is worthy of note that this is an imperfect
                                   technique. As Chalmers points out, “an inductive inference with true premises [can] lead to false
                                   conclusions”. The example set may be an incomplete representation of the true population, or
                                   correct but inappropriate rules may be derived which apply only to the example set. A simple
                                   demonstration of this type of learning is to consider the following set of bit-strings (each digit
                                   can only take on the value 0 or 1), each noted as either a positive or negative.
                                   In logic, we often refer to the two broad methods of reasoning as the deductive and inductive
                                   approaches. Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes
                                   this is informally called a “top-down” approach. We might begin with thinking up a theory
                                   about our topic of interest. We then narrow that down into more specific hypotheses that we can
                                   test. We narrow down even further when we collect observations to address the hypotheses.
                                   This ultimately leads us to be able to test the hypotheses with specific data – a confirmation (or
                                   not) of our original theories.
                                   Inductive reasoning works the other way, moving from specific observations to broader
                                   generalizations and theories. Informally, we sometimes call this a “bottom up” approach. In
                                   inductive reasoning, we begin with specific observations and measures, begin to detect patterns
                                   and regularities, formulate some tentative hypotheses that we can explore, and finally end up
                                   developing some general conclusions or theories.

                                       !
                                     Caution Learning should be applied after refining the given task.




                                      Task  Create a learning chart for a car Driving.


                                   Self Assessment

                                   State whether the following statements are true or false:
                                   9.  Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific.

                                   10.  Inductive learning is essentially learning by example.

                                   14.6 Generalization and Specialization

                                   Terms such as superclass, subclass, or inheritance come to mind when thinking about the object-
                                   oriented approach. These concepts are very important when dealing with object-oriented
                                   programming languages such as Java, Smalltalk, or C++. For modeling classes that illustrate
                                   technical concepts they are secondary. The reason for this is that modeling relevant objects or
                                   ideas from the real world gives little opportunity for using inheritance (compare the class
                                   diagram of our case study). Nevertheless, we would like to further introduce these terms at this
                                   point in Figure 14.3 shown below:








          260                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271