Page 27 - DCAP302_ENTERPRISE_RESOURCE_PLANNING
P. 27

Unit 2: ERP and Related Technology




          information  technologies  and  the  organization  that  supports  these  processes.  Understanding   notes
          that process transformation is ultimately about doing work differently, is the key to successful
          transformation. According to Hammer (1990), “Re-engineering is rethinking work”. Frequently
          there  is  confusion  about  what  re-engineering  is  and  is  not,  and  how  it  differs  from  process
          improvement or ‘quick hits’.

          2.3 How re-engineering is different from process improvements?

          Typically, process improvements fall into three categories: quick hits, incremental improvement
          and re-engineering.
          1.   Quick Hits: These are typically low risk, easily achievable efforts that provide immediate
               payback opportunities (typically within a few months).

          2.   Incremental Improvement: This focuses on closing small performance gaps, delivers small
               degrees of change that achieve small but meaningful business results.
               Figure 2.1 illustrates the basic steps in Process Improvement.

                             figure 2.1: continuous process improvement model
               Document AS –   Establish     Follow          Measure      Identify and
               IS process     measures       process       performance    implement
                                                                          improvements

               This process begins by documenting what organizations do today, establish some way
               to measure the process based on what their customers want, follow the process, measure
               the  results,  and  then  identify  improvement  opportunities  based  on  the  data  collected.
               Organizations  then  implement  process  improvements,  and  measure  the  performance
               of  the  new  process.  This  loop  repeats  over  and  over  again,  and  is  called  continuous
               process improvement. It is also called business process improvement, functional process
               improvement,  etc.  This  method  for  improving  business  processes  is  effective  to  obtain
               gradual, incremental improvement. However, over the last few years several factors have
               accelerated  the  need  to  improve  business  processes.  The  most  obvious  is  technology.
               Technologies (like the Internet) are rapidly bringing new capabilities to businesses, thereby
               raising the competitive bar and the need to improve business processes dramatically.
               As a result, companies have sought out methods for faster business process improvement.
               Moreover, organizations want breakthrough performance changes, not just incremental
               changes, and they want it now. Because the rate of change has increased for everyone, few
               businesses can afford a slow change process. One approach for rapid change and dramatic
               improvement is business process re-engineering (BPR).
          3.   Re-engineering: This demonstrates breakthrough thinking and aims at dramatic business
               results.  Unlike  quick  hits  and  incremental  improvement,  re-engineering  is  a  form  of
               organizational change characterized by dramatic process transformation.
          BPR relies on a different school of thought than continuous process improvement. In the extreme,
          re-engineering  assumes  that  the  current  process  is  irrelevant,  it  does  not  work,  it  is  broken,
          forget it. Start over. Such a clear slate perspective enables the designers of business processes to
          disassociate themselves from today’s process, and focus on a new process. It is like projecting
          the organization into the future and asking themselves: what should the process look like? What
          do their customers want it to look like? What to other employees want it to look like? How do
          best-in-class organizations do it? What might they be able to do with ERP?
          Such an approach is shown in Figure 2.2. It begins with mobilizing for action and defining the
          scope and objectives of the re-engineering project and then planning for it, then documenting




                                           LoveLy professionaL university                                    21
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32